Re: change width of index fields

2000-03-31 Thread Byrial Jensen
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 21:37:15 +0100, J McKitrick wrote: > On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 09:25:26PM -0500, Michael Tatge wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > Does anybody know of a way to change the width of the index columns? > > 102 F Feb 14 To wunderkind@c ( 9) Re: HRK-Mitschnitt Deutschland > >

Re: change width of index fields

2000-03-31 Thread J McKitrick
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 09:25:26PM -0500, Michael Tatge wrote: > Hi all! > > Does anybody know of a way to change the width of the index columns? > 102 F Feb 14 To wunderkind@c ( 9) Re: HRK-Mitschnitt Deutschland > ^^^ > As you can see sometimes the sender/to fiel

Re: 2 index option questions

2000-03-31 Thread Michael Tatge
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 07:27:06PM +0100, J McKitrick wrote: > On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 08:09:20PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 06:35:39PM +0100, J McKitrick wrote: > > > 1. When i respond to a mailing list, i would like my message to NOT > > > show up in my mailbo

change width of index fields

2000-03-31 Thread Michael Tatge
Hi all! Does anybody know of a way to change the width of the index columns? 102 F Feb 14 To wunderkind@c ( 9) Re: HRK-Mitschnitt Deutschland ^^^ As you can see sometimes the sender/to field does not fit. Any hints? Michael

Re: The Mail-Followup-To header (was: 2 index option questions)

2000-03-31 Thread Mikko Hänninen
J McKitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 31 Mar 2000: > Yes, Mikko, very helpfull indeed. Now i just need to RTFM about > setting mutt up to handle my mailing lists more efficiently. Oops, I meant to mention that but forgot. Look up the "lists" command in the manual. There's also a separa

Re: 2 index option questions

2000-03-31 Thread Michael . Tatge
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 08:09:20PM -0500, Michael Tatge wrote: > On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 06:35:39PM +0100, J McKitrick wrote: > > 1. When i respond to a mailing list, i would like my message to NOT > > show up in my mailbox. SO far, i have been using 'g' group reply for > > mailing lists. > >

Re: The Mail-Followup-To header (was: 2 index option questions)

2000-03-31 Thread J McKitrick
Yes, Mikko, very helpfull indeed. Now i just need to RTFM about setting mutt up to handle my mailing lists more efficiently. jm -- Jonathon McKitrick -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] "You're the guy from the Hambuger Train, right?" -

The Mail-Followup-To header (was: 2 index option questions)

2000-03-31 Thread Mikko Hänninen
J McKitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 31 Mar 2000: > > If you want MfT-Headers to be created, then YES you want to. > ^^^ > What are these? MFT stands for "Mail-Followup-To". They are headers designated to provide a hint (or instruction) to a mailer program as to wh

Re: 2 index option questions

2000-03-31 Thread J McKitrick
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 08:09:20PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 06:35:39PM +0100, J McKitrick wrote: > > 1. When i respond to a mailing list, i would like my message to NOT > > show up in my mailbox. SO far, i have been using 'g' group reply for > > mailing lists.

Re: 2 index option questions

2000-03-31 Thread Michael . Tatge
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 06:35:39PM +0100, J McKitrick wrote: > 1. When i respond to a mailing list, i would like my message to NOT > show up in my mailbox. SO far, i have been using 'g' group reply for > mailing lists. > DO i want list reply instead? If you want MfT-Headers to be created, then

Re: 2 index option questions

2000-03-31 Thread Mikko Hänninen
J McKitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 31 Mar 2000: > 1. When i respond to a mailing list, i would like my message to NOT > show up in my mailbox. SO far, i have been using 'g' group reply for > mailing lists. DO i want list reply instead? Or is there an option i > need to set for this?

Re: 2 index option questions

2000-03-31 Thread Hall Stevenson
>1. When i respond to a mailing list, i would like my message to NOT >show up in my mailbox. SO far, i have been using 'g' group reply for >mailing lists. DO i want list reply instead? Or is there an option i >need to set for this? unset metoo >2. Is there a funtion for save-thread? I know

Re: Any suggestion on mailling list?

2000-03-31 Thread Mikko Hänninen
David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 31 Mar 2000: > Have you looked > at the "mpack" utility? It encodes attachments and sends them in a > batch mode. At least according to the docs, and my brief testing, mpack will only include *one* file as attachment. I think the person who is as

2 index option questions

2000-03-31 Thread J McKitrick
Two simple things. I know there are options for the first, but i can't quite figure out the combination to do what i want. The second i don't think exists. 1. When i respond to a mailing list, i would like my message to NOT show up in my mailbox. SO far, i have been using 'g' group reply for

Re: Any suggestion on mailling list?

2000-03-31 Thread David DeSimone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My idea is to use Mutt to encode the attachments and produce the > headers. This is not a bad idea, but Mutt is really designed more for interactive use, and thus, there may be other tools better suited. Have you looked at the "mpack" utility? It

Pgp with mutt, how?

2000-03-31 Thread Hartmut Gehrke-Tschudi
I run Mutt 1.0pre3i (1999-09-25) when I get an Pgp encoded message, how can I decode it within Mutt? In .muttrc all is set, according to PGP-Notes.txt: set pgp_default_version=pgp2 set pgp_receive_version="default" set pgp_key_version="default" set pgp_send_version="default" set pgp_sign_micalg=

Re: quoting reply

2000-03-31 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 20:21:56 +0100, Lars Hecking wrote: > The manual says: > > ... You are strongly encouraged not to > change this value, as it tends to agitate the more fanatical netizens. > ... IMHO, the indent_string feature should be removed. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>