On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 05:10:38PM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
>
> > Error in /home/jmnova3/.muttrc, line 102: pgp_v2: unknown variable
> > Error in /home/jmnova3/.muttrc, line 103: pgp_v2_language: unknown variable
> > Error in /home/jmnova3/.muttrc, line 104: pgp_v2_pubring: unknown variable
> >
Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 10 Feb 2000:
> I have a major problem with Mutt 1.0i. Mail to some hosts does not reach its
> destination without me getting an error message.
What is the error message?
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://ww
Hi,
I have a major problem with Mutt 1.0i. Mail to some hosts does not reach its
destination without me getting an error message. I use sendmail as MTA and
it seems that sendmail is correctly configured. When I use netscape or kmail
this does not happen though I also use sendmail as MTA then.
The
After invoking GPG, mutt frequently screws up its screen. This is
easily fixed with ^l, however, is there a way to get it to do this
automagically?
Thanks,
A.
--
Adam Sherman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+1 (613) 223-5746
Claus Assmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2000, Lars Hecking wrote:
>
> > The Sender: header is written by the MTA (eg. sendmail).
>
> sendmail does not generate a "Sender:" header.
> Which MTA does it?
exim does, sometimes.
Would it be possible to use Mutt with S/MIME cryptography?
Some of my clients are using this and it would be good of me to be
able to handle their mail.
Thanks,
A.
--
Adam Sherman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+1 (613) 223-5746
PGP signature
Hello all Mutt gurus,
Just recently I got a message where the content had apparently been
split into 5 separate parts (messages).
The headers reveal:
Mime-Version: 1.0 (split by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: message/partial; id="Thu_Feb_10_00:24:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
number=1; total=5
X-Mailer: G
Brett Neely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 09 Feb 2000:
> I'd like to know if there is a way to save email without confirming where
> to save it, in the case of a defined save-hook. I.e., I set up a save-hook,
> read an email which matches this save-hook, hit 's', and its automatically
> saved
A.V. Jayanthan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My question here is that, what do I do in .muttrc so that when I press
> 's' to save a mail received from this mailing list, it should
> automatically show =mutt, the folder into which I save all these
> mails.
save-hook '~C mutt-users' +mutt-us
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 01:15:01AM +0530, A.V. Jayanthan wrote:
:
: I subscribe to this mailing list. I receive mails from all
:those who send mail to this mailing list. My question here is that,
:what do I do in .muttrc so that when I press 's' to save a mail
:received from this mailing lis
Hi,
I'd like to know if there is a way to save email without confirming where
to save it, in the case of a defined save-hook. I.e., I set up a save-hook,
read an email which matches this save-hook, hit 's', and its automatically
saved without asking me to confirm the save folder. Is this possib
It's rumored that around Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 09:18:24PM -0600
Jason Helfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If anyone out there is using muttzilla, is their a way to have an
> email
> open in alternative Xterm, like Konsole, or rxvt?
I use it with Eterm, you can alter his mzmail.(py|sh) script to u
2000-02-09-13:19:34 Holger Eitzenberger:
> Muttzilla? I just searched www.google.com and www.altavista.com for
> it but did not find anything. Where do i find it?
Add www.freshmeat.net to your search strategies; these days it's
my first stop for finding software.
It gives http://www3.telus.net
When help is unset, the top line in the compose menu is blank, but in
all other menu's, the top line is not blank -- it has what ever is
appropriate for the menu(If the index menu, there's a message there,
etc). Is this a bug?
--paul
A.V. Jayanthan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 10 Feb 2000:
> what do I do in .muttrc so that when I press 's' to save a mail
> received from this mailing list, it should automatically show =mutt,
> the folder into which I save all these mails.
Either:
save-hook "~C mutt-users@" =mutt
...fo
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 07:35:25PM +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
> I often send mail to a number of recipients some (often lists) have their
> own send hook with a special signature, but what happens is that all the
> recipients then get this signature appended.
>
> Is it possible to have the sig appl
Adam Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does anyone have some good looking color schemes?
I do. ;)
> I tried a few that I found on the web, they were pretty awful...
Well, try this:
Colorization
color indexwhite black ~F
color header brightwhite
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mutt does notify me when I run it (in the new=x, folders with new
> mail). The problem is that when I change to that folder and leave
> without having read all the new mail, mutt will tell me that I have no
> folders with new mail.
I think this is
Hi,
I subscribe to this mailing list. I receive mails from all
those who send mail to this mailing list. My question here is that,
what do I do in .muttrc so that when I press 's' to save a mail
received from this mailing list, it should automatically show =mutt,
the folder into which I sa
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 01:17:50PM -0600, Kent R. Frazier wrote:
:On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 05:05:30PM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
:> Claus Assmann writes:
:> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2000, Lars Hecking wrote:
:> >
:> > > The Sender: header is written by the MTA (eg. sendmail).
:> >
:> > sendmail does no
Jason Helfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If anyone out there is using muttzilla, is their a way to have an
> email open in alternative Xterm, like Konsole, or rxvt?
I use a similar program called altmail_mutt, which is basically a hack
of the altmail_elm program that somebody posted here seve
Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 09 Feb 2000:
> Is it possible to have the sig apply only to the one recipient who
> triggered the hook?
No, because this would in fact meaning two separate emails, since the
message bodies would be different. Mutt can't send two different emails
with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 09 Feb 2000:
> Does anyone have know how could I get mutt to
> do what I want? Should I change the mailbox
> format (MMDF, MH, Maildir) to do this?
I use Maildir, and saving "old new" emails works fine, and Mutt reports
new mail in these folde
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 05:05:30PM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
> Claus Assmann writes:
> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2000, Lars Hecking wrote:
> >
> > > The Sender: header is written by the MTA (eg. sendmail).
> >
> > sendmail does not generate a "Sender:" header.
> > Which MTA does it?
>
> Mutt doesn't
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 07:19:34PM +0100, Holger Eitzenberger wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 09:18:24PM -0600, Jason Helfman wrote:
> > If anyone out there is using muttzilla, is their a way to have an email
> > open in alternative Xterm, like Konsole, or rxvt?
>
> Muttzilla? I just searched w
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 09:18:24PM -0600, Jason Helfman wrote:
> If anyone out there is using muttzilla, is their a way to have an email
> open in alternative Xterm, like Konsole, or rxvt?
Muttzilla? I just searched www.google.com and www.altavista.com for
it but did not find anything. Where do
On Wed, Feb 09 2000, at 19:35 +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
>I often send mail to a number of recipients some (often lists) have their
>own send hook with a special signature, but what happens is that all the
>recipients then get this signature appended.
>Is it possible to have the sig apply only to th
Claus Assmann writes:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2000, Lars Hecking wrote:
>
> > The Sender: header is written by the MTA (eg. sendmail).
>
> sendmail does not generate a "Sender:" header.
> Which MTA does it?
Mutt doesn't, either. What does this leave? Mailing list software?
I often send mail to a number of recipients some (often lists) have their
own send hook with a special signature, but what happens is that all the
recipients then get this signature appended.
Is it possible to have the sig apply only to the one recipient who
triggered the hook?
thanx
--
Eric Sm
Kent R. Frazier writes:
> Sorry, I really ment the "Sender" header, not "X-Sender".
The Sender: header is written by the MTA (eg. sendmail).
On 2000-02-09 11:20:42 -0500, Adam Sherman wrote:
> Does anyone have some good looking color schemes?
I'm using the attached ones.
colors.default is intended to be used with an xterm, colors.linux on
the Linux console.
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
# -*-muttrc-*-
color hdrdefault blue b
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 11:20:42AM -0500, Adam Sherman wrote:
> Does anyone have some good looking color schemes?
>
> I tried a few that I found on the web, they were pretty awful...
Depends on your definition of "good looking" doesn't it? I'd point you to
mine http://www.hagbard.demon.co.uk/mut
Adam Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have some good looking color schemes?
>
> I tried a few that I found on the web, they were pretty awful...
I've found the following works well for me in an SSH window under
Windows -- it's not quite as nice in an xterm. Much of it was stolen
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000, Lars Hecking wrote:
> The Sender: header is written by the MTA (eg. sendmail).
sendmail does not generate a "Sender:" header.
Which MTA does it?
Does anyone have some good looking color schemes?
I tried a few that I found on the web, they were pretty awful...
Thanks,
A.
(mutt.themes.org anyone?)
--
Adam Sherman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+1 (613) 223-5746
Sorry, I really ment the "Sender" header, not "X-Sender".
Kent
--
Kent R. Frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG Fingerprint: 5EAC 06F2 6D79 F329 5C45 19AA EC0F 8F5A 9F2E 5558
GPG Key at: http://www.pobox.com/~kfrazier/public-keys.html
Linux: The Operating System for the GNU Millennium
On Wed, 09 Feb 2000, 13:55, Frank Derichsweiler wrote:
(sorry about that Subject header :)
> > folder-hook "!" set sendmail="/usr/sbin/sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> I use folder-hook FOLDERNAME 'set sendmail="SENDMAILCOMMAND "'
> ^ ^
>
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 08:26:28AM -0600, Kent R. Frazier wrote:
> I'm not sure if this relates to mutt or sendmail, I'm new to both.
> Would someone be kind enough to tell me how to change the X-Sender
> header? I have attached a copy of what it currently shows.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Kent
> --
>
Referring to Shao Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Feb 09, 2000:
| Is there anyway to stop mutt reading from /etc/Muttrc.
| I have my own .muttrc in the home directory, but it seems that
| mutt is still trying to read /etc/Muttrc.
mutt -help
Have A Nice Day,
Wolfgang
--
Wolfgang
I'm not sure if this relates to mutt or sendmail, I'm new to both.
Would someone be kind enough to tell me how to change the X-Sender
header? I have attached a copy of what it currently shows.
Thank you,
Kent
--
Kent R. Frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG Fingerprint: 5EAC 06F2 6D79 F329 5C45 19AA
I am building mutt on Solaris 2.6 and get the following error right at
the end of 'make install':-
gcc -Wall -pedantic -g -O2 -o mutt addrbook.o alias.o attach.o base64.o browser.o
buffy.o color.o commands.o complete.o compose.o copy.o curs_lib.o curs_main.o date.o
edit.o enter.o flags.o ini
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 11:03:11AM +0100, Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
> I can't seem to get mutt to use different sendmail settings for different
> folders:
>
> folder-hook "!" set sendmail="/usr/sbin/sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
---end quoted text---
I use folder-hook FOLDERNAME 'set sendmail="S
Hello!
On 2000-02-08 22:44:11 -0500, Adam Sherman wrote:
> My pgp_list_pubring_command is "gpg --no-verbose --batch --with-colons
> --list-keys %r".
> Mutt seems to have trouble with the output, it first wants me to
> select a key instead of using the 'pub' entry. Is my format wrong or
> is this
Hi,
Is there anyway to stop mutt reading from /etc/Muttrc.
I have my own .muttrc in the home directory, but it seems that
mutt is still trying to read /etc/Muttrc.
Shao.
--
Shao Zhang - Running
On 2000-02-09 09:11:06 -0200, Jorge Godoy wrote:
> If I'm missing something, please tell me.
Think about the case of several private keys in your secret key
ring. Which key the underlying version of PGP uses for signing may
depend on settings in that program's configuration file, the order
of
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 09:19:27AM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2000-02-09 00:51:22 -0500, Jim Breton wrote:
>
> > Question though: is there any possibility of getting Mutt to
> > realize the correct mic alg for your default signing key? How
> > come it can't do this already, is it because
I am using procmail to automatically deliver part of my
incoming mail in certain mailboxes. I want mutt to
notify me when any of these mailboxes get new mail,
so I have added
mailbox
to my .muttrc.
Mutt does notify me when I run it (in the new=x,
folders with new mail). The problem is
Hi,
I can't seem to get mutt to use different sendmail settings for different
folders:
folder-hook "!" set sendmail="/usr/sbin/sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
just makes mutt beep when switching to that folder...
I thought that ANY configuration setting could be made from a folder hook?
Thanks,
David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Your message starts with Reply-To: because you are always supposed to
> put a blank line between the message headers, and your text. Since you
> didn't, the empty Reply-To header is treated as part of your message.
> You should change your E-mail habits acc
On Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 06:50:22PM -0500, Yifang Dai wrote:
> Hi, here is a situation that bothers me a lot, I receive fax in an
> attachment as tif files. But mutt doesn't recognize it as
> image/tiff but instead as:
>
> [-- Attachment #2: aaaeoth9.tif --]
> [-- Type: application/octet-stream, E
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 01:07:30AM +0100, rex wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 12:59:22PM +, Tom Friedetzky wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 12:35:35PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > > ... you add +encrypttoself to these commands.
> >
> > This does the trick nicely. Than
On 2000-02-09 00:51:22 -0500, Jim Breton wrote:
> Question though: is there any possibility of getting Mutt to
> realize the correct mic alg for your default signing key? How
> come it can't do this already, is it because it hasn't yet
> invoked GPG/PGP to see the list of keys?
The problem is t
52 matches
Mail list logo
