On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 03:43:04AM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 01:48:19PM -0800, rex wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 01:23:19PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > >
> > > This way I strongly recommend everybody to use 'set psp_encryptself' in
> > > ~/.muttrc (for
mention I'm in finals week. sigh...
> Frank
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 11:33:43AM +, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> > > I'm interested in that feature also. Is it already contained in the snapshot
> > > mutt-stable-19991220.tar.gz which I just d
On Monday, 20 December 1999 at 13:22, Larry P . Schrof wrote:
> Mutt apparently does not honor the [ALERT] IMAP server response code.
> According to the IMAP RFC's, it must.
>
> Here's a log of the IMAP dialogue between my mutt client and the IMAP
> server. As you will see, the server is indeed i
Jan & rex, et al --
...and then Jan-Benedict Glaw said...
% On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 01:48:19PM -0800, rex wrote:
% > On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 01:23:19PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
% > >
... paraphrased to "use pgp_encryptself or encrypt-to settings"
% >
% > This is very dangerous if you eve
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 01:48:19PM -0800, rex wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 01:23:19PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> >
> > This way I strongly recommend everybody to use 'set psp_encryptself' in
> > ~/.muttrc (for PGP) or 'encrypt-to 0xKEYID' in ~/.gnupg/options (for GnuPG)
> > instead of
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 01:23:19PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
>
> This way I strongly recommend everybody to use 'set psp_encryptself' in
> ~/.muttrc (for PGP) or 'encrypt-to 0xKEYID' in ~/.gnupg/options (for GnuPG)
> instead of saving (encrypted) mails in plaintext...
This is very dangerou
Caldwell Warley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Recently I downloaded mutt 1.0 and tried the configure command. This was the result:
>
> loading cache ./config.cache
> checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
> checking whether build environment is sane... yes
> checking wheth
Recently I downloaded mutt 1.0 and tried the configure command. This was the result:
loading cache ./config.cache
checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... no
checking for working aclocal..
Michael Elkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl
> while (<>) {
> last if /^---/;
> print;
> }
This is a wonderful idea, but the above script could be dangerous...
it'll cut off any message to the list, with a row of dashes in it:
---
Better to search for an
Michael Elkins [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 1999 at 07:49:34AM -0500, Subba Rao wrote:
> > Is there anyway to delete this information with the
> > help of Mutt automatically?
> >
> > > ---
> > > You are currently subscribed to XYZ as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > To unsubscribe send a
On Sat, Dec 18, 1999 at 07:49:34AM -0500, Subba Rao wrote:
> Is there anyway to delete this information with the
> help of Mutt automatically?
>
> > ---
> > You are currently subscribed to XYZ as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
This is clearly
Mutt apparently does not honor the [ALERT] IMAP server response code.
According to the IMAP RFC's, it must.
Here's a log of the IMAP dialogue between my mutt client and the IMAP
server. As you will see, the server is indeed issuing an ALERT on the
second-to-last line of the output.
--- BEGIN IMA
I am in a mailing list which appends the following information to each user.
I guess this is a new feature in the listserver (sparklist) software. When I reply
to the list, this piece of information remains in the note. Each time I reply to this
list, I have to be very conscious to delete this in
Caldwell Warley [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I am new to mutt - and very unfamiliar with PGP. Would someone please
> point me to a good beginner resource for using PGP with Mutt?
Search around, esp at http://www.pgpi.org/ ... there's plenty out there.
--
Jeremy Blosser | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
contained in the snapshot
> > mutt-stable-19991220.tar.gz which I just downloaded? The problem
>
> I don't know what that snapshot is.
>
> > is, er . . . this shapshot does not contain a ./configure script
> > so I don't know how to install it (I tried just copying
Try Simson Garfinkel, PGP Pretty Good Privacy, O'Reilly &
Assoc. (http://www.ora.com) 1995. (http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/pgp/)
The copy I have is dated 1995; there is a more recent reprint, May of
1999.
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 09:23:47AM -0500, Caldwell Warley wrote:
-> Good morning,
->
-> I
Jan-Benedict Glaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 20 Dec 1999:
> Does this make that much sense? Why do I encrypt some mails? --> because I
> only want same very few people to be able to read them. This excludes (IMHO)
> even the system administrator, which would happily be able to read mails
>
Good morning,
I am new to mutt - and very unfamiliar with PGP. Would someone please point me to a
good beginner resource for using PGP with Mutt?
What I have read so far seems to assume that you are familiar with PGP.
Thanks,
--
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Green
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 09:57:03AM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 1999-12-19 10:17:02 -0800, Michael Elkins wrote:
>
> > Mutt saves an exact copy of what actually gets sent. You need to
> > use the `set pgp_encryptself' so that messages will additionally
> > be encrypted to yourself, allowed
I'm interested in that feature also. Is it already contained in the snapshot
mutt-stable-19991220.tar.gz which I just downloaded? The problem
is, er . . . this shapshot does not contain a ./configure script
so I don't know how to install it (I tried just copying the
./configure scrip
On 1999-12-19 10:17:02 -0800, Michael Elkins wrote:
> Mutt saves an exact copy of what actually gets sent. You need to
> use the `set pgp_encryptself' so that messages will additionally
> be encrypted to yourself, allowed you to read saved outgoing
> mail.
Actually, the unstable branch has an f
21 matches
Mail list logo
