Yesterday I posted a question about whether it was possible
to install mutt for oneself without having the root
writing permissions. The only advice I received was
to run configure with the prefix pointed to my home directory.
This is what I did from the very beginning:
./configure --prefix=/hom
I was wondering if there is anyway to export a message,thread, and or
mailbox without the headers. I would like to export an entire mailbox and
a couple of threads but I don't want any headers, only the body of the
text. Is there any way to do this, or a program/script that will edit out
the hea
++ 27/09/99 12:16 +0200 - Thomas Roessler:
>> I was using mutt for a long time without any problems. A few days
>> ago I decided to upgrade to mutt1.0pre2i and now I am doomed.
>
>There have been several reports of this kind of bug before.
>Typically, they were caused by incomplete or incorrect gl
Hi,
When I press e to edit a message it also allows me to edit some of the
headers. But some, notably the "References" header line, is left out.
What is the reasoning for not allowing me to edit the References and
are there other headers that don't show up when I edit a message?
Richard
--
Sol
* Brian Fields ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've been using Pine with IMAP on a Linux server and I want to move to
> mutt because of its wonderful interface and configurability.
>
> I just joined the list today and cannot find any mention of using an
> address book as in Pine. Is
For once, I know the answer :) (Or, more accurately, where to find it..)
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 05:04:54PM -0400 or thereabouts, Brian Fields wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been using Pine with IMAP on a Linux server and I want to move to
> mutt because of its wonderful interface and configurability
> At 11:55 -0700 04 Oct 1999, Robert Chien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Which RFC specifies the format of In-reply-to:? Reason I ask
> > is because dtmail (as well as Eudora Pro, hotmail) doesn't
> > seem to do it and thus breaks my threads in mutt. I would
> > like to submit a bug report and ne
At 11:55 -0700 04 Oct 1999, Robert Chien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which RFC specifies the format of In-reply-to:? Reason I ask
> is because dtmail (as well as Eudora Pro, hotmail) doesn't
> seem to do it and thus breaks my threads in mutt. I would
> like to submit a bug report and need some re
Hello,
I've been using Pine with IMAP on a Linux server and I want to move to
mutt because of its wonderful interface and configurability.
I just joined the list today and cannot find any mention of using an
address book as in Pine. Is there a way to add an addressbook to mutt?
Thanks in adva
Don Blaheta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok, I've been having similar problems (I maintain the local copy of
> mutt, but don't have root; I need to use a special program "cscp" to
> copy files into the public hierarchy), so I configured with
> "--prefix=./subdir".
The problem you'll run into he
You can find it on the standard PGP key servers, and in the
attachment to this message.
On 1999-10-04 15:22:15 -0400, Howard Arons wrote:
> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 15:22:15 -0400
> From: Howard Arons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: PGP Sig on Distros
>
> Where is the PGP key
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If mutt is running, and I receive new email, mutt doesn't add the
> message to the index list until I hit a key.
Mutt has a $timeout variable that tells how often it will stop waiting
for a keypress from you, while in the index screen, and then go
Jess Thrysoee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just sent this message to the list, and I saw that mutt adds a
> "Reply-To" in the body of the message. How do I remove this behavior?
>
> > Reply-To:
> > Hi all
You must have header-editing turned on. When you do, you must be
careful not to inse
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> I'm quite new to mutt, and so far very happy with how it works, and
> how configurable it is. I've got a problem that is probably just me
> missing something obvious, and would appreciate a pointer. If mutt is
> running, and I receive new email, mutt doesn't add the me
Don Blaheta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 04 Oct 1999:
> > If configure finds /doc (and maybe /doc/mutt), it puts
> > the documentation there.
>
> First of all, I had set prefix to "./subdir". Second, /usr/local/doc
> does not exist on our system.
But you probably didn't have a directory ca
I'm quite new to mutt, and so far very happy with how it works, and how
configurable it is. I've got a problem that is probably just me missing
something obvious, and would appreciate a pointer. If mutt is running, and I
receive new email, mutt doesn't add the message to the index list until I h
Where is the PGP key to be found that will check the detached sigs on the
Mutt source distros? I didn't find it on the mutt.org site, and I can't find
anything in the tarball docs.
Howard Arons
--
Powered by SuSE Linux 5.2 -- Upgraded to kernel 2.0.36
Communications by Mutt 0.93.2i
Quoth David Ellement:
> On 991004, at 14:29:52, Don Blaheta wrote:
> > It starts off nice, dealing with ./subdir/man, but then decides it needs
> > access to /usr/local/doc/mutt, which I don't have. I'd fix this in the
> > configure script, but autoconf is still a mysterious black box to me.
>
>
On 991004, at 14:29:52, Don Blaheta wrote:
> It starts off nice, dealing with ./subdir/man, but then decides it needs
> access to /usr/local/doc/mutt, which I don't have. I'd fix this in the
> configure script, but autoconf is still a mysterious black box to me.
If configure finds /doc (and mayb
On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 11:29:39PM -0400, Fairlight wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 11:58:58PM +0200, Jan Houtsma thus spoke:
> > In the index with threads what does the star (*) mean in the arrow?
> >
> > for example:
> > message1 bla
> > message2 |->
> > message3
Don Blaheta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 04 Oct 1999:
> It starts off nice, dealing with ./subdir/man, but then decides it needs
> access to /usr/local/doc/mutt, which I don't have. I'd fix this in the
> configure script, but autoconf is still a mysterious black box to me.
There's an option
Quoth Andreas Kahari:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sergei Duzhin writes:
> [cut]
> > Question: is this possible and, if yes, what changes should I
> > make in the Makefile?
> >
> > Sergei Duzhin,
> > The University of Aizu
>
> Yes.
>
> None.
>
> Run 'configure' with the option "--prefix=/path/to/l
Hi,
I'd like mutt (I use 0.95.7i) to automatically set the fcc for a newly
composed mail to the mailbox from which I issued the mail command. I.e.
when I'm in =my/box and compose a new message, it should have Fcc: =my/box.
I tried
fcc-hook ~A -
since, according to the manual, - means the mailb
Thus spake Raju K V ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I think all that is required is to run
> configure --prefix=/path/to/install/mutt
> and run 'make install'. If you still have problems like 'mail folder is
> read-only' comment out 'define USE_DOTLOCK 1' in config.h after running
> configure. Then run 'm
Staffan Hämälä <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 04 Oct 1999:
> send-hook . "set record=~/mail/sent-mail-date +%Y-%m"
>
> What's wrong is that it this morning it still saved in -99-09 for me.
> I got it to update to -99-10 by restarting mutt, but normally I don't
> exit mutt that often. Shouldn't
Dirk Huebner [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> seems as if you made a directory as root. Is that right? If so, it is
> not possible to save sth. in this directory because you (user) is not
> the owner. Check your permissions. I would suggest changig ownership
> of the directory to your user
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 12:30:21AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser thus spoke:
> ashley [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > i am trying to figure out how i can mark all mail in a mail folder as
> > read. i can see how you mark a thread, or specific message, but not how
> > to mark all messages as read. is this p
hi,
I think all that is required is to run
configure --prefix=/path/to/install/mutt
and run 'make install'. If you still have problems like 'mail folder is
read-only' comment out 'define USE_DOTLOCK 1' in config.h after running
configure. Then run 'make install'.
HTH,
Raju
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999
I just noticed that the following line from my muttrc doesn't work
as expected:
send-hook . "set record=~/mail/sent-mail-date +%Y-%m"
What's wrong is that it this morning it still saved in -99-09 for me.
I got it to update to -99-10 by restarting mutt, but normally I don't
exit mutt that often.
Hi, Sergei Duzhin!
Sometime (on Monday, October 4 at 13:01) I've received something...
>I have installed mutt a couple of times on Linux systems,
>as a root, and had no problems whatever.
>Now I want to install it on a Sparcstation, where I am an
>ordinary user.
>The usual installation proce
I have installed mutt a couple of times on Linux systems,
as a root, and had no problems whatever.
Now I want to install it on a Sparcstation, where I am an
ordinary user.
The usual installation procedure does not succeed because
of write permissions to various catalogs.
Mutt's installation guide
31 matches
Mail list logo
