I don't quite agree with what you proposed, but you gave me some good
food for thought. Here goes...
On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 10:48:49PM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
> On Wednesday, 01 September 1999 at 14:18, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
> > I like the idea of having two different actions (view
On Wednesday, 01 September 1999 at 14:18, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
> Hi, folks --
>
> As a user, I know what I'd like to see: some listing of folders and
> subfolders a la eudora, without mentioning any mailboxes thereunder
> (that's for the other display).
>
> I like the idea of having tw
I'm so used to seeing Mutt compile cleanly, I figured I'd share the
following warnings during the last compile... (reformated for read-
ability, of course)
SunOS 5.5.1 Generic_103640-18 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-1
gcc version 2.8.1
gcc -DSHAREDIR=\"/usr/local/share/mutt\" -DSYSCONF
Hi out there!
I've finally resolved the issue with mutt-PGP and the US laws...
And: I just made the following RPMs available:
Mutt International Version
--
URL: http://mutt.linuxatwork.at (NEW SITE)
RPMS:
mutt-1.0pre2i-1.cfp.rhl5.i386.rpm
mutt-1.0pre2i-1.rhl5.i386.rpm
Thanks for all of the feedback. The behavior isn't
exactly clear from the manual. The fact that things
are permanently changed is mentioned for folder-hook
but *not* for send-hook. IMO, it would make more
sense to have things temporary for sending mail, but
if a generic send-hook is req
On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 10:37:21AM +, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> I was playing with the index_format variable today and I got stuck
> somewhere. If i add a line like set index_format="%C %a" in .muttrc it
> works fine by itself. If, however, I add it in a folder-hook like:
> folder-hook Misc_Mes
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 12:39:02AM +0200, Oliver Immich wrote:
[...]
> I installed the 1.0pre1i rpms on my RH 5.2 today. Everything´s fine but
>color-support.
> The rc-file is correct (I even used the ´old´ one without success).
[...]
In case you were using my RPMs: Did you try the "cmutt" wrap
Hi, folks --
As a user, I know what I'd like to see: some listing of folders and
subfolders a la eudora, without mentioning any mailboxes thereunder
(that's for the other display).
I like the idea of having two different actions (view-directory and
open-item) for the same "object" (a folder). S
On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 10:31:26AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I found a small section 4.5 of the manual.txt it mentions setting up a
> wrapper script to querry a ldap server. Has anyone written a script
> that I can use?
Have you looked at http://www.fiction.net/blong/programs/mutt/
I act
On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 10:37:45AM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
> Now now.
Sorry, shouldn't write e-mail when I'm tired and grumpy...
> This actually isn't a big deal if you are using a GUI client with a mailbox
> window separate from the message index window and one of those nifty
> tree-view wi
I found a small section 4.5 of the manual.txt it mentions setting up a wrapper script
to querry a ldap server. Has anyone written a script that I can use?
Brian D. Winters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 1999 at 03:22:42PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
> > I wonder, though, if our original poster, who used a setting like
> > folder="{imapserver}INBOX." was attempting to get Mutt to translate
> > "+folder" into "{imapserver}INBOX.folder",
Once upon a time Thomas Wolmer VK/EHS/OM/DE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told us:
> Problem:
>
> ehswolm@vksun25:~/mutt-1.0pre1>make install
> Making install in doc
> .
> .
> .
> Making install in charsets
> cd . && sh ./gen_charsets
> ./../mkinstalldirs /home/5/ehswolm/share/mutt/charsets
> ( cd . && for
On Wed, 01 Sep 1999, J Horacio MG wrote:
> BTW, could anyone tell me what the following setting means?
>
> set pgp_show_unusable
6.3.101. pgp_show_unusable
Type: boolean
Default: yes
If set, mutt will display non-usable keys on the PGP key selection
menu. This includes keys which
Mark Weinem dijo:
> Hi,
>
> (Debian GNU/Linux 2.1, 2.0.36)
>
> I'm running GnuPG 0.9.10-2. Gpg is the default in ~/.muttrc, and gpgm
> is a symbolic link to gpg. But sending my public key or encrypting
> still doesn't work. Mutt always asks for a key ID but every input
> seems to be wrong.
I
Mutt 1.0pre2 is out. This version is (once again ;-) considered to
be a release candidate.
Against 1.0pre1, there are several build changes (building this
version of mutt with SGI's cc should work), and back-ports of
IMAP-related bug fixes from the unstable branch.
Download information
Hi,
(Debian GNU/Linux 2.1, 2.0.36)
I'm running GnuPG 0.9.10-2. Gpg is the default in ~/.muttrc, and gpgm
is a symbolic link to gpg. But sending my public key or encrypting
still doesn't work. Mutt always asks for a key ID but every input
seems to be wrong.
# cat ~/.muttrc
--- 8< ---
unset pg
On 1999-08-31 18:23:23 -0400, Joshua Weage wrote:
> If that is the case, then anything that was changed with a
> send-hook applies to all further messages that you send until
> another send-hook is encountered? IMO, that is a bad idea, and
> isn't mentioned in the manual. What is the appr
18 matches
Mail list logo
