Brian D. Winters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> set spoolfile='{imapserver}inbox'
> set folder='{imapserver}INBOX'
That first setting works, and makes sense, but the second doesn't. Mutt
will take the second setting and expand it whenever a path is referenced
that starts with "=" or "+". It doe
> > - How could I change my mbox folders to maildir? Any program
> > that does this?
Yes, it's called Mutt. :)
Pete Toscano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> you can call mutt from the command line and have it execute the
> following: have it change to the renamed folder
> (c=renamedfolde
On Fri, Aug 27, 1999 at 01:47:48PM -0400, Thomas Shay wrote:
> I've recently switched to using a Cyrus IMAP server for mail, and can't
> figure out how to specify the path to mail folders on the server. With
> pine, the format seems to be {imapserver}INBOX.[] (this points at what
I ran across one
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't know. I just had this happen for xv to view image/gif files.
> If I view the attachment, it works great, but if I set up autoview, it tells
> me that I don't have an entry for image/gif files.
Auto_view won't "find" the entry unless
I don't know. I just had this happen for xv to view image/gif files.
If I view the attachment, it works great, but if I set up autoview, it tells
me that I don't have an entry for image/gif files.
Ideas?
Mike
On Fri, Aug 27, 1999 at 09:05:06PM +0100, Paul Wray wrote:
> D
Thomas Shay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've recently switched to using a Cyrus IMAP server for mail, and can't
> figure out how to specify the path to mail folders on the server. With
> pine, the format seems to be {imapserver}INBOX.[] (this points at what
> pine calls a "folder collection) and
Dear all
An email from a fellow subscriber helped me disover that I had a non-existent
directory in my mailcap path :-( Once I removed this all was well...
The moral of the story is to be careful when you copy someone else's muttrc...
On Fri, Aug 27, 1999 at 04:26:52PM +0100, Paul Wray wrote:
>
On Fri, Aug 27, 1999 at 08:50:08AM -0400, Fairlight wrote:
> Apparently References: headers are being generated to >254 characters, and
> some mailing list MTA's are bouncing/rejecting the messages because the
> headers are considered fried.
>
> 1) Is that an RFC limit, or an MTA shortfall?
> 2)
I've recently switched to using a Cyrus IMAP server for mail, and can't
figure out how to specify the path to mail folders on the server. With
pine, the format seems to be {imapserver}INBOX.[] (this points at what
pine calls a "folder collection) and with netscape the format seems to
be {imapserve
Raju --
I don't know about your disappearing mail problem, but I bet that your
read-only mailbox problem is because mutt_dotlock, installed in the
same directory as mutt, is not running with the mail group id.
To test, see if you can open some other mailbox instead of your inbox
and make any cha
On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote:
> On 26/Aug/1999, Michael Elkins wrote:
>
> > As for which is best, maildir probably works faster for large mailboxes since
> > each message is stored in a separate file, so things like deleting message 500
> > of 1000 happen instantaneously wher
Hello all
I don't understand why I get the message
"mailcap entry for type text/html not found"
when I view a message containing an html attachment.
In my .mailcap file I have the line:
text/html; lynx -dump -force_html %s; copiousoutput; nametemplate=%s.html
and I have "auto_view text/html
On 26/Aug/1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> except for the fact that mutt doesn't want to put put my email address in
> the ' From: ' of my message. It just puts my name there, and my ISP won't
my_hdr 'From: My Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
This should work. Not sure of the syntax,
On 26/Aug/1999, Michael Elkins wrote:
> As for which is best, maildir probably works faster for large mailboxes since
> each message is stored in a separate file, so things like deleting message 500
> of 1000 happen instantaneously whereas in a mbox style you have to rewrite
> half of the mailbox
On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Kim DeVaughn wrote:
> Personally, I've never found any good reason to use anything other than
> mbox style boxes. They are also easier to do "external" things with (like
> grep'ing the contents, etc), and seem to have fewer problems with "new mail"
> notification/indicatio
erik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 26 Aug 1999:
> i want to have save hooks set up so that if i recive
> an email from a certain person, when i go to save it, it goes in a
> cetain mailbox, and if it is from someone else, it will go in another
> one.
Read the section in the manual about save-
- Original Message -
From: Kim DeVaughn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mutt Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 27, 1999 2:35 AM
Subject: Re: mbox or MAILDIR
> On Thu, Aug 26, 1999, Michael Elkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> |
> | On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 04:51:04PM +1000, Craig McVe
hi all,
I am new to mutt. I downloaded mutt and compiled it. Here is the o/p of my
mutt -v:
/home/rajukv> mutt -v
Mutt 1.0pre1i (1999-08-24)
Copyright (C) 1996-9 Michael R. Elkins and others.
Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'.
Mutt is free software, and you are
On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 01:29:07PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm a mutt newbie, and this is my first post to this list. I've
> downloaded mutt (V 0.95.6-us), and installed it without problems. Mutt is
> able to receive my Email (I'm subscribed to a couple of other lists)
> proper
hi,
this is probably a really easy question, but apparently i still cant
figure it out. i want to have save hooks set up so that if i recive
an email from a certain person, when i go to save it, it goes in a
cetain mailbox, and if it is from someone else, it will go in another
one. I dont mean
On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 03:25:39PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 12:10:44PM -0700, Rene Tio wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 10:58:39AM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 10:36:57AM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > > 1) When typing on mutts co
Hi,
I'm using mutt version 1.0pre1i and gnupg 0.9.10
When I envrypt, or both encrypt and sign a message, it works fine, but when
I add an attachment to the message aswell, i get the following prompt:
Enter keyID for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nothing I can enter (my gpg key ID, or anyhting else) works
I just heard of a problem from someone who just started using mutt that
concerns me.
Apparently References: headers are being generated to >254 characters, and
some mailing list MTA's are bouncing/rejecting the messages because the
headers are considered fried.
1) Is that an RFC limit, or an MTA
On Fri, Aug 27, 1999, Thomas Roessler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
|
| > Personally, I've never found any good reason to use anything other
| > than mbox style boxes. They are also easier to do "external"
| > things with (like grep'ing the contents, etc), and seem to have
| > fewer problems with "ne
On 1999-08-27 00:35:56 -0600, Kim DeVaughn wrote:
> Personally, I've never found any good reason to use anything other
> than mbox style boxes. They are also easier to do "external"
> things with (like grep'ing the contents, etc), and seem to have
> fewer problems with "new mail" notification/in
25 matches
Mail list logo
