Re: pre-compiled binaries for W95 or DOS ?

1999-07-07 Thread Jim Graham
On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 09:09:47AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Does anyone know where I can get pre-compiled binaries for mutt > for Windows 95 or DOS ? It sure would suck less. Well, I tried to compile it one day (under Win 95), and I *DID* get it compiled (using the Cygwin toolkit)

Re: lists behaviour

1999-07-07 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Thomas Roessler [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > On 1999-07-07 20:02:02 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > > > I have a question about the behaviour of the "lists" command. As > > far as I know, you're only meant to use the first part of the email > > address for each list (before the @) when listing ma

Re: Mutt or rxvt bug?

1999-07-07 Thread Rob Reid
Hi, At 3:41 PM EDT on July 7 Staffan Hämälä sent off: > Does anyone know if it's a bug in Mutt or Rxvt that causes Mutt to use bold > fonts when rxvt has been compiled without --enable-xpm-background ? This is more likely an rxvt bug, but I'm not on that list...;-) I run mutt in an rxvt compi

Re: lists behaviour

1999-07-07 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 07 Jul 1999: > Forget the "before the @" part of the description. The parameter > you give to lists is the leading part of an e-mail address, possibly > including the @. Ahh, so it's possible to list entire email addresses? Eg. "lists [EMAIL PRO

Re: lists behaviour

1999-07-07 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 1999-07-07 20:02:02 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > I have a question about the behaviour of the "lists" command. As > far as I know, you're only meant to use the first part of the email > address for each list (before the @) when listing mailing lists > with "lists". I've always wondered why

Mutt or rxvt bug?

1999-07-07 Thread Staffan Hämälä
Hi, Does anyone know if it's a bug in Mutt or Rxvt that causes Mutt to use bold fonts when rxvt has been compiled without --enable-xpm-background ? I've noticed this on both Solaris and Linux machines, and it's a bit annoying. Not that it's much of a job to recompile rxvt, but it feels strange t

mutt and IRIX

1999-07-07 Thread Stephan Seitz
Hi! I tried to compile mutt-0.95.6 on IRIX64 6.2 03131016 IP19. config.site: # IRIX ANSI CC CC='cc' CFLAGS='-n32 -O -OPT:Olimit=0 -I/usr/local/include' LDFLAGS=-n32 There were following two problems: charsets/Makefile.in parse_i18n: parse_i18n.o $(LIBOBJS) $(CC) -o parse_i18n parse_i18n

Re: additional flags

1999-07-07 Thread David Thorburn-Gundlach
Hi, folks -- ...and then Kim DeVaughn said... % On Fri, Jul 02, 1999, David Thorburn-Gundlach ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: % | % | I have taken to storing letters in my mailbox when I have read them but % | still want a reminder that there's something to do. I'm interested in % | adding additional

Re: attachment and winblows users

1999-07-07 Thread David Thorburn-Gundlach
Robin -- ...and then Robin Gruyters said... % % I mean that the message is also send as a attachment. Well, technically, it's always an attachment, but usually the only one. Once you have an attachment, you typically have the text body as another attachment with a little blurb above it telling

lists behaviour

1999-07-07 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Hello, I have a question about the behaviour of the "lists" command. As far as I know, you're only meant to use the first part of the email address for each list (before the @) when listing mailing lists with "lists". I've always wondered why this is so, and not the whole address, but so far it

pre-compiled binaries for W95 or DOS ?

1999-07-07 Thread tlhall
Does anyone know where I can get pre-compiled binaries for mutt for Windows 95 or DOS ? It sure would suck less.

Re: HTML Mail -> no temp file

1999-07-07 Thread Roland Rosenfeld
On Wed, 07 Jul 1999, Brian Salter-Duke wrote: > > text/html; (netscape -remote 'openFile(%s)' || netscape %s)\; sleep 10; \ > >test=test -n "$DISPLAY" > Could you explain what is really going here? Why the two calls to > netscape sparated by ||? This first tries to start netscape -remot

Re: Using both PGP 2.6.3i and GPG?

1999-07-07 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 1999-07-07 15:40:42 +0200, Ralph Niere wrote: > Oh really? Is it part of any recent GPG releases? It's published separately on ftp.guug.de/pub/gnupg/contrib (i think).

Re: Using both PGP 2.6.3i and GPG?

1999-07-07 Thread Ralph Niere
> On Wed, Jul 07 1999, at 12:49 +0200, Ralph Niere wrote: > >is ist possible to use both PGP 2.6.3 and GPG side by side, so that when > >either a PGP 2 or PGP 5|6 signed/encrypted mail comes in mutt fires up the > >right program to check/decrypt the mail? > > Since there's an RSAREF module for GP

Re: a bash subshell instead of a sh one, straight off

1999-07-07 Thread lang
On Sat, Jun 12, 1999 at 11:11:05AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [H]ow can I avoid the sh subshell and get a bash subshell > instead straight off. I don't want to have to press enter and > then type exit after. I solved this by putting the following in .muttrc macro generic ! "\n" I had t

Re: HTML Mail -> no temp file

1999-07-07 Thread Brian Salter-Duke
On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 01:27:31PM +0200, Roland Rosenfeld wrote: > On Tue, 06 Jul 1999, Hal Burgiss wrote: > > > Trying to view html mail and I get a NS message to the effect of: > > > > No Such File: /tmp/mutt > > > > Correct there is no such file -- anywhere. I have tmpdir set to /tmp i

Re: HTML Mail -> no temp file

1999-07-07 Thread Roland Rosenfeld
On Tue, 06 Jul 1999, Hal Burgiss wrote: > Trying to view html mail and I get a NS message to the effect of: > > No Such File: /tmp/mutt > > Correct there is no such file -- anywhere. I have tmpdir set to /tmp in > .muttrc. I don't see that mutt is creating any temp files in this > situatio

color/console vs. xterm

1999-07-07 Thread Morten Bo Johansen
I have the following entry in my .muttrc: color quoted black yellow Strangely the color for quotings which should be yellow stand out as dark-orange on the console whereas it appears fine yellow in an xterm. Could anyone explain to me why this is and perhaps also explain how to make

Re: Using both PGP 2.6.3i and GPG?

1999-07-07 Thread Marco Goetze
On Wed, Jul 07 1999, at 12:49 +0200, Ralph Niere wrote: >is ist possible to use both PGP 2.6.3 and GPG side by side, so that when >either a PGP 2 or PGP 5|6 signed/encrypted mail comes in mutt fires up the >right program to check/decrypt the mail? Since there's an RSAREF module for GPG (that work

Using both PGP 2.6.3i and GPG?

1999-07-07 Thread Ralph Niere
Hi, is ist possible to use both PGP 2.6.3 and GPG side by side, so that when either a PGP 2 or PGP 5|6 signed/encrypted mail comes in mutt fires up the right program to check/decrypt the mail? Ralph -- Ralph Niere Phone: ++49 6241 955 174 Guru for hire Worms, Ge

Strange reverse_alias behaviour

1999-07-07 Thread Renaud Colinet
Hello there, Yesterday I received an email from a friend whose address is in my .mutt.aliases file, but his name did not appear in the index as I had defined it, but as his personal name as set by his mailer. I compared the address in the alias file and in the header, they were the same. I then