On Tue, 06 Apr 1999, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > This changes the variable pipe_decode but when it was unset before
> > it will be unset after running urlview. I want pipe_decode to be
> > unset normally, so this is acceptable for me.
> I don't like this, because if one day, I set pipe_decode, th
On Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 22:55:58 +0200, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> This changes the variable pipe_decode but when it was unset before it
> will be unset after running urlview. I want pipe_decode to be unset
> normally, so this is acceptable for me.
I don't like this, because if one day, I set pipe
On Tue, Apr 06, 1999 at 12:28:26AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My apologies, I know this subject was treated a while ago, but I lost the
> mail which had this reference. I mean a pointer to a URL on info about
> compressed mail folders with Mutt; could anyone refresh my mind, please?
The
On Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 03:17:36PM -0700, Todd Strilchuk wrote:
> Mutt 0.85e: =temp (threads) [27/27] [N=0,*=0,post=0,new=0]
Upgrade post haste!
The behaviour of the limit command and many other things has improved
in recent versions. There are definite conversion quirks, but most
can be worked
My apologies, I know this subject was treated a while ago, but I lost the
mail which had this reference. I mean a pointer to a URL on info about
compressed mail folders with Mutt; could anyone refresh my mind, please?
TIA
Horacio
--
Claves - GnuPG/PGP - Keys : http://www.rediris.es/cert/keyse
On Mon, 05 Apr 1999, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> and urlview thought that the URL were
> "http://astro.utoronto.ca/~reid/mutt/=20"
> instead of
> "http://astro.utoronto.ca/~reid/mutt/"
> Is there a way to send decoded attachments to urlview (without
> modifying variables)?
I use the following:
Petr Hlustik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, for me it happens about 50% of the time. For mailing to some
> people (e.g., this message to the list), I have to go back to Pine
> which is greatly annoying. I tried installing 0.95.4 but the behavior
> persists.
I suggest that you run Mutt und
On Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 15:19:15 -0400, Vikas Agnihotri wrote:
> This is becoming a little silly. If you get a broken multipart mail,
> most likely Mutt would not display it properly in the first place. So,
> the question of editing it to fix it is moot.
Why? For instance, some mailers send attac
On Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 13:01:44 -0400, Vikas Agnihotri wrote:
> Works fine for me. Try setting 'pipe_decode' so that Mutt decodes
> stuff before feeding it to urlview.
But I don't want to set it (except if one can set it *locally*).
--
Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - PhD stud. in Compute
Many (most? all?) operations only work on visible messages.
So, after your limit, simply to a:
Tall
On Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 01:27:32PM -0700, Todd Strilchuk wrote:
> is there any way to have the search pattern used for a limit command
> to simultaneously apply to a tag command? usually i limit m
is there any way to have the search pattern used for a limit command
to simultaneously apply to a tag command? usually i limit my inbox
based on certain mailing lists (i.e. mutt-users) and want to tag all
of the messages that are shown in the menu to group save them to
another mail box. right no
On 1999-04-05 15:19:15 -0400, Vikas Agnihotri wrote:
> Also, when you think about it, mail folder's are not rocket
> science. You can simply 'vim' the mail folder and edit it to your
> hearts content (keep a backup first!). Mutt is NOT an editor.
> Editing 'raw' mail is NOT within Mutt's domain.
Le Mon 05/04/1999, Vikas Agnihotri disait
> On Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 06:13:34PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> > I have 0.95.4i and when I press 'e', the whole mail isn't edited,
> > only the body (without the attachments).
>
> Thats right. When you quit the editor, you will be in the Compose
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 07:45:37AM +0200, Christian R Molls wrote:
> Sure, I just wondered if the mail that is fetched from the pop host wanders
> through sendmail or is directly put into some folder.
Ah, very different Q - it's put directly in the main mail folder.
--
Later ...
Rich Roth ---
On Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 07:00:34PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 11:31:37 -0500, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
> > Hmmm... Do you perhaps have to set edit_hdrs, which not only lets you
> > edit the headers but also everything else in the message by coincidence?
> edit
On Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 11:31:37 -0500, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
> Hmmm... Do you perhaps have to set edit_hdrs, which not only lets you
> edit the headers but also everything else in the message by coincidence?
edit_hdrs is set, but:
* attachments are not edited,
* headers are edited, b
Rob Reid's latest message contained an attachment in quoted-printable,
with an URL having a space and a newline after it, so that the encoded
line was:
http://astro.utoronto.ca/~reid/mutt/=20
and urlview thought that the URL were
"http://astro.utoronto.ca/~reid/mutt/=20"
instead of
"http:/
On Tue, 30 Mar 1999, rfi from Rich Roth wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 11:48:02PM +0200, Christian R Molls wrote:
>
> > does mutt's internal pop-support forward mail via sendmail or via port 25?
>
> I think you have a mis-understanding of POP - pop has nothing to do with
> forwarding or, for
Vincent, et al --
...and then Vincent Lefevre said...
% On Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 08:33:27 -0500, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
% > % However, a controlled editing of a whole mail repacing it in
%^^
% >
% > just press 'e' in the index view to
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=7VkxxUl3xUvPtoxk; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Once upon a time Ayman Haidar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Once upon a time Vikas Agnihotri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 04:27:12PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> > how can i have the part of a message after the `--' automatically
On Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 08:33:27 -0500, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
> % However, a controlled editing of a whole mail repacing it in
^^
> % the folder afterward would be a very interesting feature.
>
> Actually, that's finally available wi
The line in question is a problem with both sh and bash.
As near as I can tell, test does not permit multiple arguments
for the -f operand.
I ran (and reported) a similar bug in the configure for ncurses.
Tested: bsd/os 2.1, 3.*, 4.*
If you must:
for i in /usr/sbin /usr/bin /usr/lib/sendmail
do
Once upon a time Vikas Agnihotri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 04:27:12PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > how can i have the part of a message after the `--' automatically
> > removed when replying and quoting the original message?
>
> You cant. Us
Hi there,
how can i have the part of a message after the `--' automatically removed when
replying and quoting the original message?
TIA
Horacio
--
Claves - GnuPG/PGP - Keys : http://www.rediris.es/cert/keyserver
o/or
Envía un mensaje vacío a [EMAIL PROTECTED] con la línea de asunto:
Send a bla
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Mon, 05 Apr 1999, Rejo wrote:
> I think these are a little bit RTFM, but maybe you can help me
> anyway. When i'm in a field where i can enter an address i hit ^T
> for a query. I enter 'lbdbq rejo'.
> This results in a To line with:
> touch: "[EMAIL PROTECTED], Rejo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>".
As
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=AqsLC8rIMeq19msA; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
> which looks perfectly ok to me, runs as
> + IFS=
> + ac_save_ifs=
> + IFS=
> :
> + test -z /bin
> + test -f /bin/sendmail
> [snip]
> + test -z /usr/local/bin
> + test -f /usr/local/bin/sendmail
> + test -z /usr/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/lib
> + test -f /usr/sbin /usr/sbin /usr/lib/sendmail
> te
Now that I am properly accepted by majordomo I send my message again:
Dear mutters,
The company I work for has in its infinite wisdome decided to to start
using MS Exchange as our email backbone. The only silver lining is
that Exchange supports IMAP, so I can continue using mutt.
I recently bum
31 matches
Mail list logo
