Re: disable X-Mailer:?

1999-02-17 Thread Claus Assmann
On Tue, Feb 16, 1999, Randall Hopper wrote: > Claus Assmann: > |Question: how can I disable the X-Mailer: header? > I wonder if this would work: > >unmy_hdr X-Mailer > > Haven't tried it, but it seems like it should. Unless I did something wrong, it doesn't work. I use the suggestion CF

Re: send-hook bug?

1999-02-17 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Paul Visscher [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > I have [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s mail forwarding to this account(via a .forward). I > need mutt to make it look like I am replying to a mail that hasn't been > forwarded. I have the following send-hooks in my ~/.muttrc: > > send-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'm

Re: send-hook bug?

1999-02-17 Thread Stefan `Sec` Zehl
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"

send-hook bug?

1999-02-17 Thread Paul Visscher
I have [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s mail forwarding to this account(via a .forward). I need mutt to make it look like I am replying to a mail that hasn't been forwarded. I have the following send-hooks in my ~/.muttrc: send-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'my_hdr From: foobar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' send-hook '

Alias and saving question

1999-02-17 Thread David Shaw
Hi all, Is there any easy way to have the default save name be the same as the alias for an address? For example: alias joe Joe Shmoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> But, if I save this message (or mail to the user and get a Fcc), it will go to "a98985". Is there any way to make it go to "joe"? I know I

Re: deleted box

1999-02-17 Thread Stefan `Sec` Zehl
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 12:39:20PM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud wrote: >However, the potential > saving of messages multiple times is annoying, still, and will not be > infrequent in really busy mailboxes. However, I don't want to do this > whole operatio

Re: deleted box

1999-02-17 Thread Daniel Eisenbud
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 10:15:19AM -0600, David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brian Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > just wondering about the easiest way to go about makeing deleted mail > > transfer to a"trash" folder before for later retrival/deletion. > > I have been using this

Re: deleted box

1999-02-17 Thread Mun Johl
Hi all, I believe the author's name is Jeff Dubrule. I use the patch too, and it works great! I've included Jeff's text that went along with the patch: > Ok, a long time ago I griped about the lack of a "trash" mailbox to which > deleted messages would get moved. I was directed to: > > unse

Re: Archive of mailing lists?

1999-02-17 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"

Re: Archive of mailing lists?

1999-02-17 Thread Sean Ahern
Sean Ahern wrote: > I didn't see any links for these on www.mutt.org. I feel dumb. Sorry for cluttering your mailbox. I found the links to the archives right on the main www.mutt.org page. (waps head) -Sean -- __ . [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Archive of mailing lists?

1999-02-17 Thread Sean Ahern
I just upgraded from Mutt 0.85 to the latest, and would like to do a little research into what has changed. The "Changes since 0.88" link on www.mutt.org is not working (User anonymous unknown), so I was wondering if there is an archive of the mutt user's mailing list somewhere. I didn't see

Re: deleted box

1999-02-17 Thread David DeSimone
Brian Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > just wondering about the easiest way to go about makeing deleted mail > transfer to a"trash" folder before for later retrival/deletion. I have been using this patch to get a trash-folder effect; unfortunately I have lost the author's name. It was created

[0.95.3, 0.96] copy flags

1999-02-17 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 1999-02-16 22:56:58 +0100, Byrial Jensen wrote: > 0.96i seems to always invoke PGP to verify pgp-signed messages even > if $pgp_verify_sig is unset. Ups, this was the symptom of an ugly error. The problem was also present in 0.95.3, although with other symptoms. tlr -- http://home.pages.de/

Re: old home page URL in mutt.man from 0.95.3i

1999-02-17 Thread Jeremy Blosser
David Thorburn-Gundlach [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > I was just surfing through the docs for 0.95.3i while waiting for some > advice regarding compiling (heh -- I may ask the list in general in > order to find the right person :-) and noticed that the mutt home page > is still listed at hmc.edu.

[0.95.3] feature: $trash_folder

1999-02-17 Thread Daniel Eisenbud
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 12:57:52AM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 02:52:36AM -0500, Randall J. Million <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > > > What are the problems that you have with this? It would take just a > > > tiny bit of code to add a "trash_folder

Re: mutt -v (was: old home page URL in mutt.man from 0.95.3i)

1999-02-17 Thread Steve Kennedy
On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 03:33:11PM -0700, Franklin R. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 09:56:48PM +, Steve Kennedy wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 02:54:51PM -0700, Franklin R. Jones wrote: > > > while on the subject of mailing addresses and such. It would > > > also be useful to c

Re: mutt -v (was: old home page URL in mutt.man from 0.95.3i)

1999-02-17 Thread Franklin R. Jones
On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 09:56:48PM +, Steve Kennedy wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 02:54:51PM -0700, Franklin R. Jones wrote: > > > while on the subject of mailing addresses and such. It would > > also be useful to change the subscription information in the > > FAQ/manual. Every copy I

Re: deleted box

1999-02-17 Thread Daniel Eisenbud
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 02:52:36AM -0500, Randall J. Million <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What are the problems that you have with this? It would take just a > > tiny bit of code to add a "trash_folder" variable, which when set, would > > receive a copy of deleted messages. But I'm not sure w

Re: deleted box

1999-02-17 Thread Randall J. Million
> What are the problems that you have with this? It would take just a > tiny bit of code to add a "trash_folder" variable, which when set, would > receive a copy of deleted messages. But I'm not sure what doesn't work > about the above? 1. You cannot undelete messages and have them removed from

Re: deleted box

1999-02-17 Thread Daniel Eisenbud
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 02:14:33AM -0500, Randall J. Million <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > just wondering about the easiest way to go about makeing deleted mail transfer > > to a"trash" folder before for later retrival/deletion. > > I have used this method in the past which has been posted to

Re: deleted box

1999-02-17 Thread Randall J. Million
> just wondering about the easiest way to go about makeing deleted mail transfer > to a"trash" folder before for later retrival/deletion. I have used this method in the past which has been posted to mutt-users several times. Note that this is not perfect. randy #---

deleted box

1999-02-17 Thread Brian Bray
just wondering about the easiest way to go about makeing deleted mail transfer to a"trash" folder before for later retrival/deletion.

Re: index question about deleted messages

1999-02-17 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=7l042bGvurpep9Wg; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"