X-Label patches?

Hi, I was wondering about the status of David Champion's X-Label patches with respect to Mutt v.1.6.1? Has David's X-Label functionality been incorporated into Mutt? If not, are there new patches available? The patches I have are for Mutt v.1.5.8; Thanks, -- Mun

Re: X-Label patches?

Hi Richard, Thank you for your reply. On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 05:14 PM PDT, Richard Russon wrote: RR> Hi Mun, RR> RR> > I was wondering about the status of David Champion's X-Label patches RR> > with respect to Mutt v.1.6.1? RR> RR> The last I heard, he ke

Re: Next few todos

said that was fine. Thanks for all the hard work! I am very excited that you'll be merging in dgc's patches :-) -- Mun KJM> Then, perhaps it's time to clean up the code. Tobias Angele mentioned KJM> the NeoMutt group was looking into using clang-format and wondered how I

Re: Anyone have an up-to-date color-status patch?

Hi all, My apologies if this is a duplicate message (but at least it is in plain text this time :) ... I was wondering if anyone has an updated color-status patch, that was written by Thomas Glanzmann? The version I have won't apply to mutt v1.9.1 . Regards, -- Mun

Re: Anyone have an up-to-date color-status patch?

Hi Fabian, Moritz, It turns out you both are referencing the patch in question; but Moritz's referenced patch applied without any rejections and the functionality is as expected. Thanks VERY much to you both! Best regards, -- Mun On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Moritz Barsnick wrote:

Anyone have a recent IndexColor patch?

Hi, I have the mutt-1.5.12-indexcolor-3+cb.diff IndexColor patch, but it is pretty outdated now and has a lot of failures when applied to mutt v1.9.4 . I was just wondering if anyone has created a newer version of the patch? Thanks, -- Mun

Re: Threading representation within Index

Hi, I apologize, but I am resurrecting an old e-mail I sent to the group (see below). My attempts to workaround Outlook have not been successful so I am attempting to approach my issue in a different manner. Please see my comments below. On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:09 PM PDT, Mun Johl wrote: MJ

Any changes to auto_view in 1.5.21?

ch applied so far is patch-1.5.11.waf.save_flag; but I can try it on a clean version of mutt if there is no logical explanation for this behavior. Regards, -- Mun

Re: Any changes to auto_view in 1.5.21?

Hi Michael, On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 08:27 PM PDT, Michael Elkins wrote: ME> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 05:47:16PM -0700, Mun wrote: ME> >I just got 1.5.21 compiled on my Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.5 system and ME> >noticed that the behavior of auto_view has changed (for me). In my M

Is there a way to _bounce_ all Outlook messages to Unix?

ly screwed? Or is there a solution out there that I can employ to have all my e-mails go to my unix account (as if they were 'bounced') without anyone in IT having to modify anything on the exchange server? Any assistance would be greatly appreciated! -- Mun

Help needed to configure w3m as my HTML viewer

change the auto_view rendering, and still use the 'mutt_opera' script when I'm within the attachments view. Thanks in advance. -- Mun

Re: Help needed to configure w3m as my HTML viewer

Hi Kyle, Thanks for the quick reply. Please see my comments below. On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 10:27 PM PDT, Mun Johl wrote: > On Tuesday, August 5 at 09:51 PM, quoth Mun Johl: >> I've been using w3m to render HTML messages within my mutt window for >> quite a while. My HTML

Problems with Cedric's purge-message patch and 1.5.19

rmore, the message is marked with a 'D' in the index, not an 'E'. Note that I applied the patches to 1.5.18 and they worked fine. Any ideas? -- Mun

Threading representation within Index

t what else I need to modify in the header so that mutt can function properly. Thanks in advance. -- Mun

Re: Threading representation within Index

Hi Rocco, On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:49 PM PDT, Rocco Rutte wrote: RR> RR> RR> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:08:58PM -0700, Mun Johl wrote: RR> > RR> > I'm trying to find out what else I need to modify in the header so that RR> > mutt can function properly. RR>

Re: Threading representation within Index

Hi Moritz, Please see my comments below. On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:16 PM PDT, Moritz Barsnick wrote: MB> MB> MB> Hi, MB> MB> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:08:58 -0700, Mun Johl wrote: MB> > Here's my issue: I forward Outlook e-mails to my Linux box (IMAP/POP are MB&g

Re: Threading representation within Index

Hi, On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 02:17 PM PDT, Mun Johl wrote: ... Text Deleted ... MJ> MB> That said, MJ> MB> you'd need to (manually?) save the attached messages back to an MJ> MB> mbox/maildir/whatever for them to appear "normal" to mutt. Perhaps MJ> MB>

Re: Threading representation within Index

Hi Kyle, On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:05 PM PDT, you wrote: > On Friday, August 28 at 03:54 PM, quoth Mun Johl: > >I didn't anticipate that Outlook would alter the format of the > >encapsulated message when it forwarded it as an attachment. That > >may be standard

Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6?

.3.3+cb patch-1.5.11.waf.save_flag patch-1.5.11.xx+cb.indexcolor patch-1.5.11cvs.vl.savehist.4 patch-1.5.12.rr.searchprogress.1 patch-1.5.12.rr.searchprogress.2 patch-1.5.13.dn.ncurses_rev.1 patch-HEAD.tg.cstatus.6 patch-cvs.jmy.indent.1 -- Mun

Re: trash folder -> 1.6?

Hi, On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 06:39 PM PDT, Vincent Lefevre wrote: VL> On 2007-04-09 16:04:23 -0700, William Yardley wrote: VL> > Anyway, anyone else think this would be a good addition? VL> VL> Yes, I'd like it (since I use it). Ditto. -- Mun

Re: Question regarding the use of double quotes in an email header

27;s name is not present in the From: line, the functionality of the patch is unusable. I'm trying to figure out where in the email transmission/reception process the names are being stripped for me, and why. But after looking at my raw mbox, this is not a mutt issue. Thanks for the reply. Regards, -- Mun

Crashes with the "indent" patch on Mutt v1.5.17

de08 "Hi %v,\n\nOn %[%a, %b %d, %Y at %I:%M %p %Z], %n wrote:", callback=0x45e4c , data=4290677536, flags=0) at muttlib.c:1000 1000 char prefix[SHORT_STRING], buf[LONG_STRING], *cp, *wptr = dest, ch; (gdb) c Breakpoint 1, mutt_FormatString (dest=0xffbe8ba8 "\n\nOn Fri, Sep 22, 2

Re: Crashes with the "indent" patch on Mutt v1.5.17

Hi Jose, That was it! Thank you very much for your quick and spot on reply :) -- Mun On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 01:06 PM PST, Jose Celestino wrote: ... Text Deleted ... JC> JC> A quick look at the code shows that col is also missing from JC> indent_format_str as it was added to

High

n. And I didn't see anything one way or the other in the manual. Thanks very much in advance. Regards, -- Mun

Re: Multi-Line Color Highlighting

ot certain if mutt's highlighting feature even supports such an option. And I didn't see anything one way or the other in the manual. Thanks very much in advance. Regards, -- Mun

Re: Multi-Line Color Highlighting

Hi Gary, Thanks very much for your informative reply. I'll attempt a similar strategy. -- Mun On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 04:55 PM PST, Gary Johnson wrote: GJ> On 2008-02-03, Mun Johl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: GJ> > (Sorry, I didn't provide a sufficient subject on the