Hi, On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 02:17 PM PDT, Mun Johl wrote:
... Text Deleted ... MJ> MB> That said, MJ> MB> you'd need to (manually?) save the attached messages back to an MJ> MB> mbox/maildir/whatever for them to appear "normal" to mutt. Perhaps MJ> MB> that's something procmail could do. MJ> MJ> I don't forward the e-mails encapsulated in an attachment. But maybe I MJ> should. Based on experiments it does appear as if the original headers MJ> are intact within the attachment. I'd just need to do some manipulation MJ> of the e-mail once I receive it to strip off the top-level MJ> encapsulation (I think). MJ> MJ> Thanks for that clue, Moritz. I'll have to do a web search to see if a MJ> utility already exists to the stripping. Otherwise, it shouldn't be too MJ> difficult via procmail and a perl script. I didn't anticipate that Outlook would alter the format of the encapsulated message when it forwarded it as an attachment. That may be standard procedure, but it throws a wrinkle into the works. For example, a signature delimiter "-- " is depicted as "--=20" in the forwarded message. Who knows what else is done. So if I want to strip out the original message, I will have to deal with unmangling the body of the message as well. Sigh. Maybe I'm better off leaving things as is for now. Regards, -- Mun
