On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 03:22:46PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2015-05-01 20:58:37 +0100, acefael wrote:
> > what do you think about the attached patch for
> > fixing one of the issues mentioned in ticket
> > http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3638
> >
> > this one is about main.c:75
>
> IMHO
On 2015-05-01 20:58:37 +0100, acefael wrote:
> what do you think about the attached patch for
> fixing one of the issues mentioned in ticket
> http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3638
>
> this one is about main.c:75
IMHO, this is just a spurious warning that the user should be able
to disable. Are th
hi,
check_seg.sh returns 0 with my change.
acefael
On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 12:03:41PM +0100, acefael wrote:
> hi,
>
> thanks for the quick reply.
>
> attached is another patch. suffix number is 2, correct?
> this one now puts N_ around the strings in the Copyright[] array.
> tested my running
hi Andriy,
On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 05:33:48PM +0300, Andrej N. Gritsenko wrote:
> Hello!
>
> acefael has written on Sunday, 3 May, at 12:06:
>
> >the diff removes "puts (_(Copyright));"
> >and it adds the loop wherein it calls "puts (_(Copyright[i]));".
> >agreed?
>
> Mea culpa. I paid
Hello!
acefael has written on Sunday, 3 May, at 12:06:
>the diff removes "puts (_(Copyright));"
>and it adds the loop wherein it calls "puts (_(Copyright[i]));".
>agreed?
Mea culpa. I paid not enough attention to the diff, I'm sorry. Your
recent patch looks pretty much fine although if
On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 12:55:00PM +0300, Andrej N. Gritsenko wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have written on Sunday, 3 May, at 12:14:
> >Eike Rathke has written on Saturday, 2 May, at 23:58:
> >>On Saturday, 2015-05-02 13:32:23 +0100, acefael wrote:
>
> >>> [...]
> >>> +"Many others not mentioned he
hi,
thanks for the quick reply.
attached is another patch. suffix number is 2, correct?
this one now puts N_ around the strings in the Copyright[] array.
tested my running mutt -v -v -v.
sorry for sending the original mail twice, had technical difficulty.
kind regards,
acefael
On Sun, May 03,
Hello!
I have written on Sunday, 3 May, at 12:14:
>Eike Rathke has written on Saturday, 2 May, at 23:58:
>>On Saturday, 2015-05-02 13:32:23 +0100, acefael wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> +"Many others not mentioned here contributed code, fixes," ,
>>> +"and suggestions." };
>>>
>>> - puts (_(Co
Hello!
Eike Rathke has written on Saturday, 2 May, at 23:58:
>On Saturday, 2015-05-02 13:32:23 +0100, acefael wrote:
>> [...]
>> +"Many others not mentioned here contributed code, fixes," ,
>> +"and suggestions." };
>>
>> - puts (_(Copyright));
>> + {
>> +int csize = size
Hi acefael,
On Saturday, 2015-05-02 13:32:23 +0100, acefael wrote:
> what do you think about the attached patch
Why send the mail twice? Anyway..
> [...]
> +"Many others not mentioned here contributed code, fixes," ,
> +"and suggestions." };
>
> - puts (_(Copyright));
> + {
> +
10 matches
Mail list logo
