Re: What happened to strict_mime?

2007-03-21 Thread TAKIZAWA Takashi
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 11:25:25PM +0900, TAKIZAWA Takashi wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 11:11:40PM +0900, > TAKIZAWA Takashi wrote: > > > The attached patch is the one that the following correction was done. > > - Remove the option $ignore_linear_white_space. >

Re: What happened to strict_mime?

2007-03-21 Thread TAKIZAWA Takashi
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 11:11:40PM +0900, TAKIZAWA Takashi wrote: > The attached patch is the one that the following correction was done. > - Remove the option $ignore_linear_white_space. > - By default, replace linear-white-space between encoded-word >and text to a

Re: What happened to strict_mime?

2007-03-21 Thread TAKIZAWA Takashi
of rfc2047.c, the > AssumedCharset related code says things like: > > n = mutt_strlen (s); > t = safe_malloc (n + 1); > strfcpy (t, s, n + 1); > > That's usually spelled as > > t = safe_strdup (s); > > in mutt code.

Re: mutt/1503: Help-Text on UTF-8 Terminals

2007-03-14 Thread TAKIZAWA Takashi
The following reply was made to PR mutt/1503; it has been noted by GNATS. From: TAKIZAWA Takashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: mutt/1503: Help-Text on UTF-8 Terminals Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 02:59:10 +0900 --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: text/plain; char

Re: PR mutt/1503: problems with utf-8 terminals

2007-03-13 Thread TAKIZAWA Takashi
The following reply was made to PR mutt/1503; it has been noted by GNATS. From: TAKIZAWA Takashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: PR mutt/1503: problems with utf-8 terminals Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 01:37:22 +0900 --gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: text/plain; char

Re: Bug#328921: mutt/1503: problems with utf-8 terminals

2007-03-13 Thread TAKIZAWA Takashi
Debian bug #328921: (See http://bugs.debian.org/32892= > 1) -- TAKIZAWA Takashi http://www.emaillab.org/ diff -r f4d3704813fd help.c --- a/help.cTue Mar 13 10:58:34 2007 +0100 +++ b/help.cWed Mar 14 01:09:50 2007 +0900 @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static void format_line (FILE *f, int is

Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6? (Debian patches)

2007-03-07 Thread TAKIZAWA Takashi
se RFC 2231 parameters. Because the pgp_charset patch and the create_rfc2047_params patch violate RFCs, I don't propose it. However, it is easy to use it when the message is sent with the user of the legacy mailer each other. -- TAKIZAWA Takashi http://www.emaillab.org/

Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6? (wcwidth)

2007-03-05 Thread TAKIZAWA Takashi
on your advice. http://www.emaillab.org/mutt/1.5.14/patch-1.5.14.tt.wcwidth.3 This is the difference from HEAD. -- TAKIZAWA Takashi http://www.emaillab.org/

Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6? (wcwidth)

2007-03-04 Thread TAKIZAWA Takashi
inion of Tamotsu-san. http://www.emaillab.org/mutt/1.5.14/patch-1.5.14.tt.wcwidth.2 It uses wcwidth() of the system by default. Ambiguous cannot be handled. It comes to be able to treat Ambiguous by putting --enable-cjk-ambiguous-width by the configure script. -- TAKIZAWA Takashi http://www.emaillab.org/

Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6? (wcwidth)

2007-03-03 Thread TAKIZAWA Takashi
stems doesn't support Ambiguous. If it wants to use wcwidth() of the systems, another patch that can be changed in the configure script is prepared. http://www.emaillab.org/mutt/1.5.14/patch-1.5.14.tt.wcwidth-alt.1 -- TAKIZAWA Takashi http://www.emaillab.org/

Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6? (Debian patches)

2007-02-27 Thread TAKIZAWA Takashi
For instance, users who are using Mutt with Debian. I do not think that there is a problem even if leaving it though it is thought that I may delete $file_charset if there is no necessity. -- TAKIZAWA Takashi http://www.emaillab.org/

Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6? (Debian patches)

2007-02-27 Thread TAKIZAWA Takashi
Hi, Tamotsu-san. On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:36:09PM +0900, TAKAHASHI Tamotsu wrote: > * Tue Feb 27 2007 TAKIZAWA Takashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Perhaps the difference is: > > - a bugfix concerning memory allocation > > - "+tamo" part, which is resu

Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6? (Debian patches)

2007-02-26 Thread TAKIZAWA Takashi
he difference between > 1.5.6-assumed.1 (Christoph's one) and 1.5.14-assumed.1? > I have a poor memory. > > > * Mon Feb 26 2007 TAKIZAWA Takashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 11:11:49PM -0800, > > Brendan Cully wrote: > > > &g

Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6? (Debian patches)

2007-02-25 Thread TAKIZAWA Takashi
.14/patch-1.5.14.tt.linear_white_space.1 -- TAKIZAWA Takashi http://www.emaillab.org/