Hi.
This cause has mistaken the width of the column for the octet length.
The attached patch fixes this.
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 02:25:02PM +0100,
Christoph Berg wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR mutt/1503; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Mutt Bugs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
> Subject: Bug#328921: mutt/1503: problems with utf-8 terminals
> Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:26:56 +0100
>
> Hi,
>
> mutt/1503 is still present in the current version. Stepan provides
> some screenshots in Debian bug #328921: (See http://bugs.debian.org/32892=
> 1)
--
TAKIZAWA Takashi
http://www.emaillab.org/
diff -r f4d3704813fd help.c
--- a/help.c Tue Mar 13 10:58:34 2007 +0100
+++ b/help.c Wed Mar 14 01:09:50 2007 +0900
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static void format_line (FILE *f, int is
{
col_a = COLS > 83 ? (COLS - 32) >> 2 : 12;
col_b = COLS > 49 ? (COLS - 10) >> 1 : 19;
- col = pad (f, mutt_strlen(t1), col_a);
+ col = pad (f, mutt_strwidth(t1), col_a);
}
if (ismacro > 0)
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static void format_line (FILE *f, int is
if (!split)
{
col += print_macro (f, col_b - col - 4, &t2);
- if (mutt_strlen (t2) > col_b - col)
+ if (mutt_strwidth (t2) > col_b - col)
t2 = "...";
}
}
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static void format_line (FILE *f, int is
SKIPWS(t3);
/* FIXME: this is completely wrong */
- if ((n = mutt_strlen (t3)) > COLS - col)
+ if ((n = mutt_strwidth (t3)) > COLS - col)
{
n = COLS - col;
for (col_a = n; col_a > 0 && t3[col_a] != ' '; col_a--) ;
