Hi, Tamotsu-san. On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:36:09PM +0900, TAKAHASHI Tamotsu wrote:
> * Tue Feb 27 2007 TAKIZAWA Takashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Perhaps the difference is: > > - a bugfix concerning memory allocation > > - "+tamo" part, which is result thing of discussion by Tamotsu and Alain > > - a new patch is safer. > > Thanks for your explanation. > > I (1) reverted the old patch (rev. 3fa665562a95) and > (2) applied your patches and > (3) saved "hg diff" as the attached patch. > > Can you try this out? Yes. I tried your patch. It functions without trouble. But mutt_get_first_charset() included in an old patch is not used any longer and delete it, please. > Does it have the bug you mentioned above? No, it does not. > If it doesn't, it must be easier for Brendan to apply > than your three conflicting patches. Thanks. Brendan, cannot this patch be committed? -- TAKIZAWA Takashi http://www.emaillab.org/
