On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 05:47:16PM -0700, Mun wrote:
I just got 1.5.21 compiled on my Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.5 system and
noticed that the behavior of auto_view has changed (for me). In my
.mailcap, I have two text/html entries. The first is to launch my
browser (via Gary Johnson's old "bro
Hi,
I just got 1.5.21 compiled on my Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.5 system and
noticed that the behavior of auto_view has changed (for me). In my
.mailcap, I have two text/html entries. The first is to launch my
browser (via Gary Johnson's old "browser launcher from mutt script"),
and the second e
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 18:50:16 +0300, Vsevolod Volkov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 05:18:01PM +0200, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
> MB> 2.) an update of the NNTP patches please :-)
> Done.
You're a hero, VV! It works fine (as always).
Building the docs gives this remark:
ID recommended on sect2:
#3452: Make "Re: " prepending to subject when replying optional
-+--
Reporter: pnl | Owner: mutt-dev
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: trivial | Milestone:
Componen
* Michael Elkins on Friday, September 17, 2010 at 08:59:49 -0700
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 04:43:38PM +0200, Christian Ebert wrote:
>> The behaviour for my spoolfile is exactly as if I had the default
>> setting:
>>
>> mail_check_recent=no
>>
>> i.e. new mail is detected once, but not after I vis
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 04:43:38PM +0200, Christian Ebert wrote:
The behaviour for my spoolfile is exactly as if I had the default
setting:
mail_check_recent=no
i.e. new mail is detected once, but not after I visited the spool
and left the message(s) unread.
If you want to be notified about n
* Christian Ebert on Friday, September 17, 2010 at 16:37:09 +0200
> (also, it worked before $mail_check_recent was introduced)
>
> I just tried without it, and it does not influence the behaviour.
Addendum:
The behaviour for my spoolfile is exactly as if I had the default
setting:
mail_check_re
* Michael Elkins on Friday, September 17, 2010 at 06:52:55 -0700
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 02:01:17PM +0200, Christian Ebert wrote:
>> $ mutt -Q spoolfile mbox_type
>> spoolfile="~/Maildir"
>> mbox_type=Maildir
>> $ stat ~/Maildir/new
>> 234881026 1168278 drwx-- 2 chris chris 0 68 "Sep 17 12:02
#3452: Make "Re: " prepending to subject when replying optional
-+--
Reporter: pnl | Owner: mutt-dev
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: trivial | Milestone:
Componen
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 02:01:17PM +0200, Christian Ebert wrote:
$ mutt -Q spoolfile mbox_type
spoolfile="~/Maildir"
mbox_type=Maildir
$ stat ~/Maildir/new
234881026 1168278 drwx-- 2 chris chris 0 68 "Sep 17 12:02:50 2010" "Sep 17 01:41:20 2010"
"Sep 17 01:41:20 2010" "Nov 17 13:45:43 2008"
* David Champion on Thursday, September 16, 2010 at 22:31:18 -0500
> * On 16 Sep 2010, Christian Ebert wrote:
>>
>> This doesn't apply on case-insensitive filesystems - I'm using
>> the default HFS+ on MacOS X, which is indeed case-insensitive.
>>
>> So, no precise version header in this mail ye
* Michael Elkins on Thursday, September 16, 2010 at 17:42:13 -0700
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 01:46:41AM +0200, Christian Ebert wrote:
>> I have the new mail_check_recent variable set to yes. It works,
>> except for my spoolfile which is compiled in:
>>
>> ./configure --with-homespool=Maildir ...
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
