* Michael Elkins on Friday, September 17, 2010 at 06:52:55 -0700 > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 02:01:17PM +0200, Christian Ebert wrote: >> $ mutt -Q spoolfile mbox_type >> spoolfile="~/Maildir" >> mbox_type=Maildir >> $ stat ~/Maildir/new >> 234881026 1168278 drwx------ 2 chris chris 0 68 "Sep 17 12:02:50 2010" "Sep >> 17 01:41:20 2010" "Sep 17 01:41:20 2010" "Nov 17 13:45:43 2008" 4096 0 0 >> /Users/chris/Maildir/new >> >> Copy new message to homespool. Then: >> >> stat ~/Maildir/new >> 234881026 1168278 drwx------ 3 chris chris 0 102 "Sep 17 12:02:50 2010" "Sep >> 17 13:52:08 2010" "Sep 17 13:52:08 2010" "Nov 17 13:45:43 2008" 4096 0 0 >> /Users/chris/Maildir/new > > Can you please tell me which order those dates are (atime, ctime, mtime)?
atime, mtime, ctime $ stat -s ~/Maildir/new | cut -d ' ' -f 10 st_mtime=1284732901 New message in ~/Maildir: st_mtime=1284733668 > Do you have your spoolfile explicitly listed in your "mailboxes" > command in your muttrc? Yes, I have: mailboxes "!" (also, it worked before $mail_check_recent was introduced) I just tried without it, and it does not influence the behaviour. > The new mail detection doesn't depend on pathnames, so the fact that > it works on other Maildir format mailboxes is perplexing. Does it work without --with-homespool? c -- _BAUSTELLEN_ lesen! --->> http://www.blacktrash.org/baustellen
