From: Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It would be good to change the description of the Interpolate module
> to include the word tie. Maybe something like:
>
> Arbitrary string interpolation semantics using tie
>
> Tim.
I changed it in the module docs (will release in a few days after I
incorp
It would be good to change the description of the Interpolate module
to include the word tie. Maybe something like:
Arbitrary string interpolation semantics using tie
Tim.
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 12:17:11PM -0800, David Muir Sharnoff wrote:
> * So, how is yours different from MJD's I
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Muir Sharnoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * and, just out of curiousity, what advantage does your module
> * have over a closure? it seems you have to do more work to get
> * the same effect.
>
> How so? I don't use closures that often so maybe I'm missin
* So, how is yours different from MJD's Interpolation.pm?
It mentions tie in the documenation so people might be able to find it.
I didn't know Interpolation.pm existed. I was surprised when I couldn't
find something like it, so I figured I would provide one.
Interpolation.pm is a better in
On Nov 11, David Muir Sharnoff wrote:
>
> * In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Muir Sharnoff
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *
> * > *
> * > * Or even better, Hash::ComputedValue ?
> *
> * > Hmmm. The way I think it will be used is mostly to do minor
> * > transformations on values like add
* In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Muir Sharnoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
*
* > *
* > * Or even better, Hash::ComputedValue ?
*
* > Hmmm. The way I think it will be used is mostly to do minor
* > transformations on values like adding commas to a number eg: 1,000.
*
* that's still a c
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Muir Sharnoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *
> * Or even better, Hash::ComputedValue ?
> Hmmm. The way I think it will be used is mostly to do minor
> transformations on values like adding commas to a number eg: 1,000.
that's still a computed value, thou
*
* Or even better, Hash::ComputedValue ?
Hmmm. The way I think it will be used is mostly to do minor
transformations on values like adding commas to a number eg: 1,000.
So, how about Hash::Transforms?
-Dave
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Arthur Bergman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On söndag, nov 10, 2002, at 06:22 Europe/Stockholm, _brian_d_foy wrote:
>
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Muir
> > Sharnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On söndag, nov 10, 2002, at 06:22 Europe/Stockholm, _brian_d_foy wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Muir
Sharnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would like to allocate a module name: Tie::LookupAsFunction.
i'd like to see a more descriptive module name, perh
* In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Muir Sharnoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
*
* > I would like to allocate a module name: Tie::LookupAsFunction.
*
* i'd like to see a more descriptive module name, perhaps
*
*Tie::Hash::ComputedValue
*
* or some such.
Sure, what
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Muir Sharnoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to allocate a module name: Tie::LookupAsFunction.
i'd like to see a more descriptive module name, perhaps
Tie::Hash::ComputedValue
or some such.
--
brian d foy (one of many
I hadn't been. Tie::Math is quite strange. The syntax is bizzare.
I'm installing it now so I can see how he did it.
pause.
Wow.
The syntax is a really neat hack.
Anyway, Tie::Math fills a different role than Tie::LookupAsFunction.
Both are useful. Neither could be used in pl
On Nov 08, David Muir Sharnoff wrote:
> I would like to allocate a module name: Tie::LookupAsFunction.
>
> Nothing fancy, but I couldn't find anyone else who had released it
> as a module...
Are you familiar with Michael Schwern's Tie::Math?
- Kurt
14 matches
Mail list logo
