* In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Muir Sharnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * * > I would like to allocate a module name: Tie::LookupAsFunction. * * i'd like to see a more descriptive module name, perhaps * * Tie::Hash::ComputedValue * * or some such.
Sure, whatever. I just want a name, any name. I don't know what the process is though: is [EMAIL PROTECTED] advisory and I make the decision, or is it manditory? Tie::Hash::ComputedValue is fine with me. So is Tie::LookupAsFunction. I hadn't considered going three levels deep. The suggestion of Tie::Hash::ComputedValue leads me to have a pair of favorites: Tie::Hash::Computed Tie::Hash::Function So, if [EMAIL PROTECTED] is advisory and nobody has strong objections, I'll use Tie::Hash::Function. If it's more than advisory, then please guide me. Thanks, -Dave