* In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Muir Sharnoff 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* 
* > I would like to allocate a module name: Tie::LookupAsFunction.
* 
* i'd like to see a more descriptive module name, perhaps
* 
*    Tie::Hash::ComputedValue
* 
* or some such.

Sure, whatever.

I just want a name, any name.

I don't know what the process is though: is [EMAIL PROTECTED] advisory
and I make the decision, or is it manditory?   

Tie::Hash::ComputedValue is fine with me.  So is Tie::LookupAsFunction.

I hadn't considered going three levels deep.  The suggestion of
Tie::Hash::ComputedValue leads me to have a pair of favorites:

        Tie::Hash::Computed
        Tie::Hash::Function 

So, if [EMAIL PROTECTED] is advisory and nobody has strong objections,
I'll use Tie::Hash::Function.  If it's more than advisory, then
please guide me.

Thanks,

-Dave

Reply via email to