* In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Muir Sharnoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
*
* > I would like to allocate a module name: Tie::LookupAsFunction.
*
* i'd like to see a more descriptive module name, perhaps
*
* Tie::Hash::ComputedValue
*
* or some such.
Sure, whatever.
I just want a name, any name.
I don't know what the process is though: is [EMAIL PROTECTED] advisory
and I make the decision, or is it manditory?
Tie::Hash::ComputedValue is fine with me. So is Tie::LookupAsFunction.
I hadn't considered going three levels deep. The suggestion of
Tie::Hash::ComputedValue leads me to have a pair of favorites:
Tie::Hash::Computed
Tie::Hash::Function
So, if [EMAIL PROTECTED] is advisory and nobody has strong objections,
I'll use Tie::Hash::Function. If it's more than advisory, then
please guide me.
Thanks,
-Dave
