In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Muir Sharnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * > * Or even better, Hash::ComputedValue ? > Hmmm. The way I think it will be used is mostly to do minor > transformations on values like adding commas to a number eg: 1,000. that's still a computed value, though. > So, how about Hash::Transforms? i don't like that one so much. it is much less clear. and, just out of curiousity, what advantage does your module have over a closure? it seems you have to do more work to get the same effect. -- brian d foy (one of many PAUSE admins), http://pause.perl.org please send all messages back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
