On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 10:58:21PM +0100, Andrew Wilson wrote:
> That seems to suggest that the Email namespace was a mistake and
> shouldn't be used or am I reading it wrong? I'm happy to put it in
> either namespace.
Yep. Email::Valid was the only Email:: module before Email::Find came
along.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 04:12:02AM +0900, Tatsuhiko Miyagawa wrote:
> > > > How about Email::Valid::Tagged then?
> > >
> > > I think brian meant "under Email:: (as opposed to Mail::)" rather than
> > > "under Email::Valid::".
> >
> > yes, that's what i meant. sorry for the confusion :)
>
> FYI
(I'm the current maintainer of Email::Find)
On Sun, 21 Oct 2001 12:28:10 -0400
_brian_d_foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >there is already an Email::Valid, so something under that namespace
> > > >would be good.
> > >
> > > How about Email::Valid::Tagged then?
> >
> > I think brian meant "
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Newton) wrote:
> (Disclaimer: I don't speak for [EMAIL PROTECTED])
neither do i. ;)
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2001 14:37:53 +0100, in perl.modules you wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Oct 2001 21:37:38 -0400, brian d foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
(Disclaimer: I don't speak for [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Sun, 21 Oct 2001 14:37:53 +0100, in perl.modules you wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2001 21:37:38 -0400, _brian_d_foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 11:45:16PM +0100, Andrew Wilson wrote:
> >> I've written a module for generati
On Sat, 20 Oct 2001 21:37:38 -0400, _brian_d_foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 11:45:16PM +0100, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>> I've written a module for generating and validating certain email
>> addresses. I'm thinking of calling it Mail::Address::Tagged
>
>there is already an Em
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Wilson) wrote:
> I've written a module for generating and validating certain email
> addresses. I'm thinking of calling it Mail::Address::Tagged
there is already an Email::Valid, so something under that namespace
would be good.
--
bria