In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Newton) wrote:
> (Disclaimer: I don't speak for [EMAIL PROTECTED]) neither do i. ;) > On Sun, 21 Oct 2001 14:37:53 +0100, in perl.modules you wrote: > > On Sat, 20 Oct 2001 21:37:38 -0400, brian d foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >there is already an Email::Valid, so something under that namespace > > >would be good. > > > > How about Email::Valid::Tagged then? > > I think brian meant "under Email:: (as opposed to Mail::)" rather than > "under Email::Valid::". yes, that's what i meant. sorry for the confusion :) -- brian d foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Perl services for hire CGI Meta FAQ - http://www.perl.org/CGI_MetaFAQ.html Troubleshooting CGI scripts - http://www.perl.org/troubleshooting_CGI.html
