On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 04:12:02AM +0900, Tatsuhiko Miyagawa wrote: > > > > How about Email::Valid::Tagged then? > > > > > > I think brian meant "under Email:: (as opposed to Mail::)" rather than > > > "under Email::Valid::". > > > > yes, that's what i meant. sorry for the confusion :) > > FYI, there was a discussion for choosing namespace between > Email:: and Mail:: > http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/modules/2001-05/msg00140.html
That seems to suggest that the Email namespace was a mistake and shouldn't be used or am I reading it wrong? I'm happy to put it in either namespace. If I putting it under Mail is there anything wring with Mail::Address::Tagged? cheers Andrew
