Re: The Meta::* namespace, and the modules in it

2002-09-24 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mark Veltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > the big problem is the PAUSE won't let anyone else use it. i don't > > see a problem with that right now though. > > This doesn't seem right. The name space is NOT registered. Why would PAUSE > keep someone from using

Re: The Meta::* namespace, and the modules in it

2002-09-24 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 23 September 2002 17:36, you wrote: > I agree. Meta is a name with well established meanings and so isn't > a good choice for a new 'framework' of modules. Hi Tim! I have no problem with changing the name. As far as I undestand I'm not in

Re: The Meta::* namespace, and the modules in it

2002-09-24 Thread _brian_d_foy
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]] In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ask Bjoern Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > brian, remember to cc the original poster. modules@ doesn't generally > take subscriptions, so the person a

Re: The Meta::* namespace, and the modules in it

2002-09-24 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (_brian_d_foy) writes: brian, remember to cc the original poster. modules@ doesn't generally take subscriptions, so the person asking might miss the response if you don't. - ask -- ask bjoern hansen, http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/ !try; do();

Re: The Meta::* namespace, and the modules in it

2002-09-23 Thread Tim Bunce
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 01:22:53PM -0500, _brian_d_foy wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mark Veltzer ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > First Meta is indeed the name of the consulting company that I run but the > > name Meta is exactly right for what I need. I wanted a name without any

Re: The Meta::* namespace, and the modules in it

2002-09-20 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mark Veltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First Meta is indeed the name of the consulting company that I run but the > name Meta is exactly right for what I need. I wanted a name without any > connection to anything that people already know (like DB, XML, Develo

RE: The Meta::* namespace, and the modules in it

2002-09-20 Thread EXT-David.Helgason
Hi again, Mark Veltzer wrote: > First Meta is indeed the name of the consulting company that I run but the > name Meta is exactly right for what I need. I wanted a name without any > connection to anything that people already know (like DB, XML, Development > etc..). because Meta is a project

Re: The Meta::* namespace, and the modules in it

2002-09-20 Thread Mark Veltzer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 20 September 2002 14:20, you wrote: > Mark, > > It is good to see your modules in Meta::* being actively developed. However > I have some qualms about the whole project. > > I cannot find any documentation as to what functionality the module