> On Fri, 12 May 2000 21:56:30 +0100, Graham Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 02:31:28PM +0200, Andreas Koenig wrote:
>> > > On Thu, 11 May 2000 09:19:40 -0400, Chris Nandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>said:
>> >
>> > > So will the old ANDK directory eventually go awa
On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 03:08:33PM -0400, Kurt Starsinic wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 02:31:28PM +0200, Andreas Koenig wrote:
> > > On Thu, 11 May 2000 09:19:40 -0400, Chris Nandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>said:
> >
> > > So will the old ANDK directory eventually go away, or wil it just for
On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 02:31:28PM +0200, Andreas Koenig wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 May 2000 09:19:40 -0400, Chris Nandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>said:
>
> > So will the old ANDK directory eventually go away, or wil it just forever
> > remain a symlink?
>
> I don't know.
I think that it woul
> On Thu, 11 May 2000 09:19:40 -0400, Chris Nandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> So will the old ANDK directory eventually go away, or wil it just forever
> remain a symlink?
I don't know.
--
andreas
Andreas J. Koenig [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth:
*>
*>The gory details available on request. Every hour we will copy one
*>author's directory and will cause considerable extra traffic and many
*>deletions. Please help me watch this process to prevent accidents.
The traffic shouldn't be too horrible.
At 11.43 +0200 2000.05.11, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>> On 09 Apr 2000 13:24:29 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas J.
>>Koenig) said:
>
> > My directory is already relocated, but no further actions are
> > scheduled. Please let me know when you think that I can start.
>
>Today is the first d
On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 02:26:38PM +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 May 2000 12:24:08 +0100, Graham Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Actually it does work.
>
> Great.
>
> > Where there is a problem is that the db
> > on search.cpan.org still has indexes for distribution
> On Thu, 11 May 2000 12:24:08 +0100, Graham Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Actually it does work.
Great.
> Where there is a problem is that the db
> on search.cpan.org still has indexes for distributions that
> no longer exist on CPAN. search.cpan.org works off the goner
> emails th
On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 12:08:54PM +0100, Graham Barr wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 11:43:23AM +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> > > On 09 Apr 2000 13:24:29 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas J. Koenig)
>said:
> >
> > > My directory is already relocated, but no further actions are
> > >
On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 11:43:23AM +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> > On 09 Apr 2000 13:24:29 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas J. Koenig)
>said:
>
> > My directory is already relocated, but no further actions are
> > scheduled. Please let me know when you think that I can start.
Damn, I
> On 09 Apr 2000 13:24:29 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas J. Koenig) said:
> My directory is already relocated, but no further actions are
> scheduled. Please let me know when you think that I can start.
Today is the first day of ~12 during which the directories in the
authors/id/ tree w
On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 02:54:48PM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> But why this is happening?
I just looked. [EMAIL PROTECTED] was on the To list for the Email I replied to
After the thread a few days/weeks ago I thought it had been added as an auto
reply for [EMAIL PROTECTED], but it seems th
On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 02:54:48PM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>
> Graham Barr writes:
> > Do we really need this sent out for every Email ?
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 09, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0300, CPAN FAQbot wrote:
> > > Hi, this is a recorded message.
> > >
> > > At the tone of you may r
Graham Barr writes:
> Do we really need this sent out for every Email ?
>
> On Sun, Apr 09, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0300, CPAN FAQbot wrote:
> > Hi, this is a recorded message.
> >
> > At the tone of you may read from
> >
> >http://www.cpan.org/misc/cpan-faq.html
> >
> > the answer
Do we really need this sent out for every Email ?
On Sun, Apr 09, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0300, CPAN FAQbot wrote:
> Hi, this is a recorded message.
>
> At the tone of you may read from
>
> http://www.cpan.org/misc/cpan-faq.html
>
> the answers to the most common questions asked from [EMAIL
On Sun, Apr 09, 2000 at 01:24:29PM +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> > On Sat, 8 Apr 2000 19:03:55 +0100, Graham Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > OK, I just checked and it will affect it. I will need to modify the database
> > to point to the new directories Or modify the code, which ma
> On Sat, 8 Apr 2000 19:03:55 +0100, Graham Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> OK, I just checked and it will affect it. I will need to modify the database
> to point to the new directories Or modify the code, which may be easier.
Oops, now have I been too quick? My directory is already relo
OK, I just checked and it will affect it. I will need to modify the database
to point to the new directories Or modify the code, which may be easier.
Graham.
On Sat, Apr 08, 2000 at 06:45:54PM +0100, Graham Barr wrote:
> Hm, I think this will affect search.cpan.org as it uses the CPAN mirror on
Hm, I think this will affect search.cpan.org as it uses the CPAN mirror on that
machine when it goes to format docs. I will check.
Graham.
On Sat, Apr 08, 2000 at 06:17:07PM +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Apr 2000 16:34:27 -0400, "Kurt D. Starsinic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2000 16:34:27 -0400, "Kurt D. Starsinic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 02:40:32PM +0200, Andreas Koenig wrote:
>> I believe, the CPAN/authors/id/ directory needs a gentle cleanup.
>> Currently there is no simple algorithm to generate the directory of an
On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 02:40:32PM +0200, Andreas Koenig wrote:
> I believe, the CPAN/authors/id/ directory needs a gentle cleanup.
> Currently there is no simple algorithm to generate the directory of an
> author from the userid. The only way to find out that JHI has the
> directory JHI/ is by tr
21 matches
Mail list logo
