On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 03:08:33PM -0400, Kurt Starsinic wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 02:31:28PM +0200, Andreas Koenig wrote:
> > >>>>> On Thu, 11 May 2000 09:19:40 -0400, Chris Nandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>said:
> >
> > > So will the old ANDK directory eventually go away, or wil it just forever
> > > remain a symlink?
> >
> > I don't know.
>
> I think that it would be best if the symlink remained. That way, anybody
> who's ever made a link to that URL will be able to keep it. I don't see any
> negative effects of this.
If the symlink is to remain what is the point of all of this ?
If it is to get them all in the same place why not just create
a symlink the other way (eg G/GB/GBARR -> ../../GBARR) and
save the extra rsync traffic ?
Graham.
