Ok, I finally found a few minutes to make the change and test.
I've just uploaded the new version to my PAUSE directory.
- rick
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 10:54:44AM +0200, Andreas Koenig wrote:
> (Warming up an old thread about the question if it should be
> Speech::Recognition::XXX or Speech:
(Warming up an old thread about the question if it should be
Speech::Recognition::XXX or Speech::Recognizer::XXX)
> On 14 Jul 2001 13:32:55 -0400, David Huggins-Daines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> You're right, it wasn't given a lot of thought. An informal poll of
> the people in the sam
Richard Kilgore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The message was not intended to be hostile. I apologize if I
> stepped on your toes or something. If you'll note, my third
> sentence is a deferment to your judgment.
Ah. Don't worry, I'm pretty thick-skinned, I just enjoy a good
flamewar :)
> Sp
At 10:15 -0400 2001.07.14, David Huggins-Daines wrote:
>I would, however, like to get an outside opinion on the appropriate
>namespace. The tone of your message quoted above does not predispose
>me to cooperation but it's more important for the naming scheme to be
>consistent than aesthetically/s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Perl Authors Upload Server) writes:
> rationale:
>
> Speech::Recognizer is a lame name. Speech::Recognition would be
> considerably better. If you disagree, I can change my module to use
> the already establish naming hierarchy. I have already created
> Speec
