Richard Kilgore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The message was not intended to be hostile. I apologize if I
> stepped on your toes or something. If you'll note, my third
> sentence is a deferment to your judgment.
Ah. Don't worry, I'm pretty thick-skinned, I just enjoy a good
flamewar :)
> Speech::Recognition sounds better to me simply because it sounds
> more like a category of modules, than does Speech::Recognizer.
> Actually, I suppose from that perspective Speech::Recognizers
> would also work pretty well.
Sure. Like I said, really either one is fine with me. I'm not sure
if a single module in the Speech::Recognizer namespace is enough to
establish a precedent or not, though I think the analogy with
Speech::Synthesiser is valid (modulo the issue of 's' vs 'z' :)
> If someone had a good reason to choose the current name, then it
> does not make a big difference to me. I just figured it was
> possible that it had not been given a lot of thought, and that I
> could bring it to someone's attention.
You're right, it wasn't given a lot of thought. An informal poll of
the people in the same room with me at the moment prefers
"Recognizer", I could go either way, though it is kind of inconvenient
to change the name of a module so I'd rather not if I don't have to.
