在 ?|, 2003-09-11 14:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 寫道：
> Maybe the confusion arises because of "hash cash tokens" are being
> referred to in a general way sometimes, but that has no relevance to the
> actual hascash algorithm, or the actual hashcash tokens.
I see. I stand corrected, as googling "hash cash
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 02:50:35PM +0800, Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree. The literature term for it seem to be "Hash cash tokens",
Actually, since the original paper on the hashcash function and ALL
documentation available refer to it as "hashcash" or "Hashcash", I
_really_
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 02:50:35PM +0800, Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What about
> > Digest::HashCash
> > ^
> > what seems to be easier to read for me.
>
> I agree. The literature term for it seem to be "Hash cash tokens",
Are you sure? The draft rfc calls it "Hashc
在 ?@, 2003-09-08 10:30, Janek Schleicher 寫道：
> What about
> Digest::HashCash
> ^
> what seems to be easier to read for me.
I agree. The literature term for it seem to be "Hash cash tokens",
which suggests it can be separated into two words, which implies that
HashCash is a proper nam
Perl Authors Upload Server wrote at Sun, 07 Sep 2003 00:05:34 +0200:
> modid: Digest::Hashcash
> DSLIP: adcOg
> description: handle http://www.hashcash.org/ tokens
> userid: MLEHMANN (Marc Lehmann)
> chapterid: 14 (Security_and_Encryption)
> communities:
>
> simil
