On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 02:50:35PM +0800, Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What about
> > Digest::HashCash
> > ^
> > what seems to be easier to read for me.
>
> I agree. The literature term for it seem to be "Hash cash tokens",
Are you sure? The draft rfc calls it "Hashcash", the official webpages
call it "Hashcash", the inventor calls it "Hashcash", too.
So I think the literature term in in fact "Hashcash".
In addition, the existing reference libraries and codes all call it
"Hashcash", too, so calling it "HashCash" just makes it difficult to type
and confusing.
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
