Re: Module submission DBIx::Informix::Perform

2003-04-01 Thread Autrijus Tang
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 09:11:27PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > > I just checked and the DBIx-Perform tarball is still there in > > /W/WE/WEAV; I've "undeleted" the files. > > > > If you want to re-index it as DBIx::Perform I'm all for it. > > Thanks :) > > I think it would be easiest all round if

Re: Module submission DBIx::Informix::Perform

2003-04-01 Thread Tim Bunce
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 11:25:32AM -0800, Eric Weaver wrote: > Tim Bunce wrote: > > >On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 07:44:43AM -0800, Eric C. Weaver wrote: > > > >>[...] > >> > >>Just who's authoritative here? Autrijus or you? > > > >No one. I said "if you are willing ... would be appreciated". > >If no

Re: Module submission DBIx::Informix::Perform

2003-04-01 Thread Tim Bunce
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 01:49:46PM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 09:40:17PM -0800, Eric C. Weaver wrote: > > So, what's the official word from the modules-keepers? ::Informix:: or not? > > The official word is: keep the DBIx::Informix::Perform namespace > with our blessing,

Re: Module submission DBIx::Informix::Perform

2003-03-31 Thread Autrijus Tang
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 09:40:17PM -0800, Eric C. Weaver wrote: > So, what's the official word from the modules-keepers? ::Informix:: or not? The official word is: keep the DBIx::Informix::Perform namespace with our blessing, and please accept my personal apology for letting you be troubled with t

Re: Module submission DBIx::Informix::Perform

2003-03-31 Thread Eric C. Weaver
So, what's the official word from the modules-keepers? ::Informix:: or not? I still have the cvs checkout from before the ::Informix:: change (being a little behind on that sort of thing) and can go back to that. If not, I'll check in the change at Sourceforge. Thanks Eric Weaver grumpy develo

Re: Module submission DBIx::Informix::Perform

2003-03-31 Thread Tim Bunce
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 04:29:14AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 09:09:29PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > > It's up to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to avoid it setting any precedents. > > I mistakenly looked at DBIx::OracleSequence and DBIx::MSSQLReporter in > the module list and thought

Re: Module submission DBIx::Informix::Perform

2003-03-31 Thread Autrijus Tang
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 09:09:29PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > It's up to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to avoid it setting any precedents. I mistakenly looked at DBIx::OracleSequence and DBIx::MSSQLReporter in the module list and thought that it's okay for DBIx::Informix::Perform to go in; now I see that, foll

Re: Module submission DBIx::Informix::Perform

2003-03-31 Thread Tim Bunce
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 08:42:06AM -0800, Eric C. Weaver wrote: > Tim Bunce wrote: > >On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 07:24:55AM -0800, Eric C. Weaver wrote: > > > >>Tim Bunce wrote: > >> > >>>We have Oracle::* and others. An Informix::* namespace seems > >>>best for this. > >> > >>Too late. Besides, I *a

Re: Module submission DBIx::Informix::Perform

2003-03-31 Thread Autrijus Tang
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 05:19:01PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > I believe there is no need to "clarify" trademark issues in module > names. (In the same way that domain names that include a tradename > don't have to include the owner of the trademark.) All that's > needed is for the module *documenta

Re: Module submission DBIx::Informix::Perform

2003-03-31 Thread Tim Bunce
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 07:24:55AM -0800, Eric C. Weaver wrote: > Tim Bunce wrote: > >We have Oracle::* and others. An Informix::* namespace seems > >best for this. > > Too late. Besides, I *already* renamed it from DBIx::Perform to make > AURIJUS happy. > > >The DBIx::* space is best for modul

Re: Module submission DBIx::Informix::Perform

2003-03-31 Thread Eric C. Weaver
Tim Bunce wrote: We have Oracle::* and others. An Informix::* namespace seems best for this. Too late. Besides, I *already* renamed it from DBIx::Perform to make AURIJUS happy. The DBIx::* space is best for modules that are not database specific. Actually, this is not database specific. I've be

Re: Module submission DBIx::Informix::Perform

2003-03-31 Thread Tim Bunce
We have Oracle::* and others. An Informix::* namespace seems best for this. The DBIx::* space is best for modules that are not database specific. Tim. On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 09:28:08AM +0200, Perl Authors Upload Server wrote: > > The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module Li