On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 04:29:14AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 09:09:29PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > > It's up to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to avoid it setting any precedents. > > I mistakenly looked at DBIx::OracleSequence and DBIx::MSSQLReporter in > the module list and thought that it's okay for DBIx::Informix::Perform > to go in; now I see that, following the same naming convention, maybe it > should be called DBIx::InformixPerform or something else.
Perhaps something else without 'informix' in it - see my email about trademarks. > I sincerely apologize for the hasty approval, and will wait longer for > people to feedback in the future. No problem. Don't forget that some modules in the list pre-date newer namespaces or were in widespread use before getting listed. So take the module list itself only as a imperfect guide :) These days DBIx::OracleSequence would probably be Oracle::Sequence. I'd like to avoid more database-specific modules going into DBIx::* as that's really meant for database *I*ndependant extensions to the DBI. But I can't complain too loudly as I haven't been around to beat that drum much. Tim. p.s. My thanks to all who look after [EMAIL PROTECTED] these days.
