Re: Module submission Function::ID

2003-03-31 Thread Eric J. Roode
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 04:13:30PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > Sub::ThisFunction > Sub::CalledAs Sub::ThisFunction sounds good to me. Thanks, Tim. -- Eric J. Roode[EMAIL PROTECTED] print scalar reverse sort qw p ekca lre reh ts uJ p, $/.r, map $_.$", q

Re: Module submission Function::ID

2003-03-31 Thread Tim Bunce
Sub::ThisFunction Sub::CalledAs Tim. On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 07:45:48AM -0500, Eric J. Roode wrote: > On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 08:12:37PM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 11:37:43AM +0200, Arthur Bergman wrote: > > > I think Tie::FunctionID is wrong since the fact that the v

Re: Module submission Function::ID

2003-03-31 Thread Tim Bunce
The Devel:: namespace is meant for modules used during development/debugging, but not ordinarily used in production. Tim. On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 08:12:37PM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote: > On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 11:37:43AM +0200, Arthur Bergman wrote: > > I think Tie::FunctionID is wrong since the

Re: Module submission Function::ID

2003-03-31 Thread Arthur Bergman
On måndag, mar 31, 2003, at 14:45 Europe/Stockholm, Eric J. Roode wrote: Devel::Self? ...no, that sounds like a program that writes itself. Devel::This? Hm. That could work. That also opens the door for future functionality. Like say $this_package or something. (Yes, I know about __PACKAGE_

Re: Module submission Function::ID

2003-03-31 Thread Eric J. Roode
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 08:12:37PM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote: > On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 11:37:43AM +0200, Arthur Bergman wrote: > > I think Tie::FunctionID is wrong since the fact that the variables are > > tied is in this case implmentation specific and not function specific. > > Point. Devel:

Re: Module submission Function::ID

2003-03-30 Thread Autrijus Tang
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 02:41:06PM +0200, Arthur Bergman wrote: > >Point. Devel::FunctionID, then? > > I guess that would work. Roode, what do you think about it? :) Thanks, /Autrijus/ pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Module submission Function::ID

2003-03-30 Thread Arthur Bergman
On söndag, mar 30, 2003, at 14:12 Europe/Stockholm, Autrijus Tang wrote: On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 11:37:43AM +0200, Arthur Bergman wrote: I think Tie::FunctionID is wrong since the fact that the variables are tied is in this case implmentation specific and not function specific. Point. Devel::Func

Re: Module submission Function::ID

2003-03-30 Thread Autrijus Tang
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 11:37:43AM +0200, Arthur Bergman wrote: > I think Tie::FunctionID is wrong since the fact that the variables are > tied is in this case implmentation specific and not function specific. Point. Devel::FunctionID, then? Thanks, /Autrijus/ pgp0.pgp Description: PGP si

Re: Module submission Function::ID

2003-03-30 Thread Arthur Bergman
On söndag, mar 30, 2003, at 08:28 Europe/Stockholm, Autrijus Tang wrote: Strange; I did not see that. % zgrep 'Function::' 03modlist.data.gz | wc 0 0 0 Although Schwern has a Function::Override, it's not included in the official CPAN module list. Will, say, Tie:

Re: Module submission Function::ID

2003-03-29 Thread Autrijus Tang
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 05:49:19AM +0200, Perl Authors Upload Server wrote: > I suggested this module on comp.lang.perl.modules about a week ago, > and the response was positive. I did a search around CPAN and didn't > find any similar modules. I did see that a top-level Function:: name

Module submission Function::ID

2003-03-29 Thread Perl Authors Upload Server
The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List: modid: Function::ID DSLIP: bdprp description: Variables to let functions know their names userid: ROODE (Eric J. Roode) chapterid: 20 (Control_Flow_Utilities) communities: comp.lang.perl.modules