Sub::ThisFunction Sub::CalledAs Tim.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 07:45:48AM -0500, Eric J. Roode wrote: > On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 08:12:37PM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 11:37:43AM +0200, Arthur Bergman wrote: > > > I think Tie::FunctionID is wrong since the fact that the variables are > > > tied is in this case implmentation specific and not function specific. > > > > Point. Devel::FunctionID, then? > > > Hmm, seems a bit long. How about Devel::Function? No, that sounds > like something to help you develop functions. > > Devel::ThisFunction? Maybe... but that's even longer than > Devel::FunctionID. Closer to the actual usage, though. > > Devel::Self? ...no, that sounds like a program that writes itself. > > Devel::This? Hm. That could work. That also opens the door for > future functionality. Like say $this_package or something. (Yes, I > know about __PACKAGE__, but that doesn't interpolate into strings... > <shrug>). Or something else that someone else might suggest someday. > > What do you think of Devel::This? > > Thanks in advance. (and thanks for your comments, folks!) > > -- > Eric J. Roode [EMAIL PROTECTED] > print scalar reverse sort qw p ekca lre reh > ts uJ p, $/.r, map $_.$", qw e p h tona e;
