On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 08:12:37PM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote: > On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 11:37:43AM +0200, Arthur Bergman wrote: > > I think Tie::FunctionID is wrong since the fact that the variables are > > tied is in this case implmentation specific and not function specific. > > Point. Devel::FunctionID, then?
Hmm, seems a bit long. How about Devel::Function? No, that sounds like something to help you develop functions. Devel::ThisFunction? Maybe... but that's even longer than Devel::FunctionID. Closer to the actual usage, though. Devel::Self? ...no, that sounds like a program that writes itself. Devel::This? Hm. That could work. That also opens the door for future functionality. Like say $this_package or something. (Yes, I know about __PACKAGE__, but that doesn't interpolate into strings... <shrug>). Or something else that someone else might suggest someday. What do you think of Devel::This? Thanks in advance. (and thanks for your comments, folks!) -- Eric J. Roode [EMAIL PROTECTED] print scalar reverse sort qw p ekca lre reh ts uJ p, $/.r, map $_.$", qw e p h tona e;
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
