Re: [lem@cantv.net] Digested Articles

2000-06-27 Thread "Luis E. Muñoz"
At 07:28 p.m. 27/06/2000 +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:06:49 -0400, "Luis E. Muñoz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > > > At 11:31 a.m. 27/06/2000 +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: > >> > On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 22:17:39 -0400, "Luis E. Muñoz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>

Re: [lem@cantv.net] Digested Articles

2000-06-27 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:06:49 -0400, "Luis E. Muñoz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > At 11:31 a.m. 27/06/2000 +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: >> > On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 22:17:39 -0400, "Luis E. Muñoz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> said: >> >> > Ok then. I'll release new versions of the modules with

Re: [lem@cantv.net] Digested Articles

2000-06-27 Thread "Luis E. Muñoz"
At 11:31 a.m. 27/06/2000 +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 22:17:39 -0400, "Luis E. Muñoz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > > > Ok then. I'll release new versions of the modules with the new names. > > > Just let me know once they're ready. > >I just added NetAddr::IP to

Re: [lem@cantv.net] Digested Articles

2000-06-27 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 22:17:39 -0400, "Luis E. Muñoz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Ok then. I'll release new versions of the modules with the new names. > Just let me know once they're ready. I just added NetAddr::IP to the database of the module list. I believe, the others can remain unme

Re: [lem@cantv.net] Digested Articles

2000-06-26 Thread "Luis E. Muñoz"
At 12:48 a.m. 27/06/00 +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 16:09:57 -0400, "Luis E. Muñoz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > > >> It indeed looks much more intuitive than before. Just one thing, > >> there's a long standing tradition to discourage > >> extremely::deep::nesting

Re: [lem@cantv.net] Digested Articles

2000-06-26 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 16:09:57 -0400, "Luis E. Muñoz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> It indeed looks much more intuitive than before. Just one thing, >> there's a long standing tradition to discourage >> extremely::deep::nesting::namespaces. E.g. one could shorten >> Net::Address to NetAddr. No

Re: [lem@cantv.net] Digested Articles

2000-06-26 Thread "Luis E. Muñoz"
At 09:30 p.m. 26/06/2000 +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 09:48:04 -0400, "Luis E. Muñoz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > > >> I'm not sure, but I could imagine somewhere in the NetPacket or > >> Network hierarchie or below the Net::DNS there might be a place to > >> cons

Re: [lem@cantv.net] Digested Articles

2000-06-26 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 09:48:04 -0400, "Luis E. Muñoz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> I'm not sure, but I could imagine somewhere in the NetPacket or >> Network hierarchie or below the Net::DNS there might be a place to >> consider settling. > The modules I referred to deal specifically with r

Re: [lem@cantv.net] Digested Articles

2000-06-26 Thread "Luis E. Muñoz"
At 09:12 a.m. 26/06/00 +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: >Topics: >New Module: IP::Address >NEW Modules: Net-Subnet-Count and Tie-IP-Address >-- > >lem> A while ago I uploaded a module called IP::Address. Since then it >lem>

[lem@cantv.net] Digested Articles

2000-06-26 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
Topics: New Module: IP::Address NEW Modules: Net-Subnet-Count and Tie-IP-Address -- lem> A while ago I uploaded a module called IP::Address. Since then it lem> has been used by quite a few people in different platforms. Sin