OK. I just read your [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail, and I do what you tell me:
If we have problems or comments with your proposed namespace, we'll
respond within a week with our opinions. Note that you can still upload
a module before we approve the namespace -- it just won't ap
Hi,
Three weeks ago, I filed a request for a namespace. There's no reply yet. OK.
People say, the reply times of [EMAIL PROTECTED] are lengthy, and I understand
what voluntary contribution means. However, in my case, waiting three month
for the namespace and to upload the stuff would be real ba
>
> I think we're risking breaking the 'names should reflect what the
> module does not how it does it rule'.
>
> On reflection I think a DTD, or similar, namespace is risky.
> I think we'd be better off *ignoring* the use of XML in the
> implementation (where possible) and just considering the ab
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 02:24, Kurt D. Starsinic wrote:
> On Nov 13, Wolfgang Mueller wrote:
> > Hi,
> > This is a followup to the MRML top level name space discussion.
> >
> > I think that's it. Why not create a DTD top level namespace for all
> > mod
Hi,
If you don't scream I will ask for the DTD top level name space in a couple
of hours.
Cheers,
Wolfgang
Hi,
This is a followup to the MRML top level name space discussion.
I think that's it. Why not create a DTD top level namespace for all modules
that provide essentially routines for treating a DTD? We still can do
something special for the "bigger" DTDs like SOAP, MPEG-7 (OK, that's an XML
Sch
