On Wednesday 14 November 2001 02:24, Kurt D. Starsinic wrote: > On Nov 13, Wolfgang Mueller wrote: > > Hi, > > This is a followup to the MRML top level name space discussion. > > > > I think that's it. Why not create a DTD top level namespace for all > > modules that provide essentially routines for treating a DTD? We still > > can do something special for the "bigger" DTDs like SOAP, MPEG-7 (OK, > > that's an XML Schema) and stuff. > > > > What do you think? If you create DTD, I am very happy with DTD::MRML. > > This is really less obscure than finding XML::MRML among XML::Parser etc. > > That could be misleading. Specific modules don't always reference a > DTD -- they may use XMLSchema, an RFC, something informal, etc -- and > they may have nothing to do with validation.
As MRML where we use the DTD just for documentation purposes... (the goal is to make use of XML's graceful degradation capacities. > I don't have an alternative in mind, but I like the idea of a top-level > namespace for `specific XML implementations and applications'. I'm open to > suggestions. Some more suggestions: XMLx, XMLApp, Wolfgang
