Question for SHLOMIF (and everyone else)

2013-11-25 Thread Paul Bennett
Hi all, I'm writing my own parser to handle the complete ISO SGML specification (using the excellent Marpa::R2 by JKEGL). At the moment, it's purely a recreational effort, but the long-term plan is to get it on CPAN. Part of the plan is to store the parser output in the same format as XML::LibXML

Re: Problem naming a module

2013-11-25 Thread Aristotle Pagaltzis
Hi Philippe, there are two issues causing a problem with naming for this module: 1. very specific form of input required/expected (hash of weights) 2. tightly bound to a DSL as its API If you want to be descriptive then you simply cannot give a module like this a terribly generic name. To cover

Re: Problem naming a module

2013-11-25 Thread Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:27:58PM +0100, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: > > there are two issues causing a problem with naming for this module: > > 1. very specific form of input required/expected (hash of weights) Actually, having seen the output of List::Categorize, it's not hard to make my modul

Re: Problem naming a module

2013-11-25 Thread John M. Gamble
On Mon, November 25, 2013 5:27 am, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: > Hi Philippe, > > there are two issues causing a problem with naming for this module: > > 1. very specific form of input required/expected (hash of weights) > 2. tightly bound to a DSL as its API > > If you want to be descriptive then y

Re: Problem naming a module

2013-11-25 Thread James E Keenan
On 11/25/13 8:04 AM, Philippe Bruhat (BooK) wrote: On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:27:58PM +0100, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: [snip] The other option is to give up on being descriptive, and come up with a "brand" name. In which case, Fleur is just as fine as anything else. :-) No, it's not. "F