On 11/25/13 8:04 AM, Philippe Bruhat (BooK) wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:27:58PM +0100, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
[snip]
The other option is to give up on being descriptive, and come up with a "brand" name. In which case, Fleur is just as fine as anything else. :-)
No, it's not. "Fleur" implies a superclass of "Rose", which this is not. :-)
