Hi Philippe, there are two issues causing a problem with naming for this module:
1. very specific form of input required/expected (hash of weights) 2. tightly bound to a DSL as its API If you want to be descriptive then you simply cannot give a module like this a terribly generic name. To cover (2), you need ::Rules. To cover (1), you basically need to name all aspects: takes a hash, specifically one where the values are weights, and reduces it to a single value. So I ended up with Hash::Reduce::Weighted::Rules It’s a mouthful but seems necessary to accurately summarize the module. None of the names that omit any of these components felt satisfactory: whichever one you take out, the shorter name seems to describe a very different module. I did try to fit “Categorize” in there but it just isn’t specific enough to *replace* any component of the name, and if you just *add* it to the whole kit and caboodle, the name becomes ludicrous. So I left it out. So that’s the best I could do. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
