Hello,
I am interested in capturing my analog material to dv. On this list, the
Canopus ADVC-100 is very often recommended for that purpose. Here in Sweden
it is very hard to get one, and it is extremely expensive (around 500 USD).
Are there any other hard or software solutions for that purpose
On Monday 27 February 2006 09:04, Michael Hanke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am interested in capturing my analog material to dv. On this list, the
> Canopus ADVC-100 is very often recommended for that purpose. Here in Sweden
> it is very hard to get one, and it is extremely expensive (around 500 USD).
>
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Michael Hanke wrote:
Hello,
I am interested in capturing my analog material to dv. On this list, the
Canopus ADVC-100 is very often recommended for that purpose. Here in Sweden
it is very hard to get one, and it is extremely expensive (around 500 USD).
Are there any other h
Hello all,
I ve recently installed mjpegtools on a duo XEON EMT64. (linux is a
gentoo). The performance of a simple lav2yuv command is twice slower
than what i get on a single CPU AMD 64. (with a cpu rating 100%)
I was wondering whether anyone could lead me into the right direction
to solve th
On Monday 27 February 2006 15:41, sebastien Pastor wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I ve recently installed mjpegtools on a duo XEON EMT64. (linux is a
> gentoo). The performance of a simple lav2yuv command is twice slower
> than what i get on a single CPU AMD 64. (with a cpu rating 100%)
> I was wondering
Humm ... this is actually quite odd ...
I ve been running the same test on my Pentium4 workstation and it
appeared to be 10 time faster than my AMD64 processor !
the command i ran is :
time lav2yuv -f 100 /my/video.mov > /dev/null
output is :
on my workstation :
real0m2.050s
user0m1
http://www.videsignline.com/howto/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=180207350
Nice introduction to the concept of compression artifacts.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripti
Hi Steven and all
I still have some troubles to run y4mtoqt.
What chromass should I feed into it ? I am using 422 and -X
Thanks
E
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into w
Hi all again
Just to let you know that J.Cornet wrote some nice tools to complete with
mjpegtools, such as yuvmotionfps etc... It could be great to have this
included in the CVS
Have a look at
http://jcornet.free.fr/
MJPEGtools section
Thanks
E
---
> I still have some troubles to run y4mtoqt.
I am not clear enough, sorry.
I can not read files produced with y4mtoqt.
lqtplay is telling me about a bad header and mplayer is running without any
display.
Cheers
E
> What chromass should I feed into it ? I am using 422 and -X
> Thanks
> E
>
>
>
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, E.Chalaron wrote:
> I still have some troubles to run y4mtoqt.
> What chromass should I feed into it ? I am using 422 and -X
and later
> I am not clear enough, sorry.
> I can not read files produced with y4mtoqt.
> lqtplay is telling me about a bad header and mplay
Hello Steven
Thanks for the reply
> Wow - those are rather different problems.
Yes ... I realised once I sent the first email.
lets put it this way : is the command -a somewavefile compulsory ? e.g.does qt
absolutely need a soundtrack
If yes then question (mail#) 2 is resolved sinc
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, E.Chalaron wrote:
> lets put it this way : is the command -a somewavefile compulsory ? e.g.does qt
> absolutely need a soundtrack
An audiotrack is NOT required. Most of the time the files I create
are without audio since I've got that as a separate .aiff fil
13 matches
Mail list logo
