Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: 24fps vs 30fps - why bother? :)

2005-06-16 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Trent Piepho wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > > mpeg2enc -D 10 -G 15 -b 6400 -c --dualprime-mpeg2 -E -10 -f 8 -q 2 -K > > tmpgenc -4 1 -2 1 -o $N.m2v > > -- > You are specifying a bitrate of 6400 bits per SECOND. Not bits pe

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: 24fps vs 30fps - why bother? :)

2005-06-16 Thread Jean Connelly
Hi Steven Regarding: > That's not what I am seeing and it's very puzzling. > > What I did was take a ~88min capture from a tape that was known to > have originated on film. The data was captured as 8bit uncompressed > (in case you're curious that's about 105GB ;)). Ste

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: 24fps vs 30fps - why bother? :)

2005-06-16 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Jean Connelly wrote: > Isn't the point of inverse-telecine 'ing to end up with a stream that > has the smoothest playback on the largest number of devices? > Including devices that are capable of 24fps playback? Hmmm, it'll look smoother on a computer display. For

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: 24fps vs 30fps - why bother? :)

2005-06-16 Thread Matto Marjanovic
>On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Trent Piepho wrote: > >> On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Steven M. Schultz wrote: >> > mpeg2enc -D 10 -G 15 -b 6400 -c --dualprime-mpeg2 -E -10 -f 8 -q 2 >> > -K tmpgenc -4 1 -2 1 -o $N.m2v >> > -- > >> You are specifying a bitrate of 6400 bits per SECO

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: 24fps vs 30fps - why bother? :)

2005-06-16 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Matto Marjanovic wrote: >"If mpeg2enc is told to encode N seconds of material with a target > bitrate of M bits/second... then the resulting file should be > roughly the N*M bits long, no matter what it is encoding." Well - that's not how it read ;) What

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: 24fps vs 30fps - why bother? :)

2005-06-16 Thread Matto Marjanovic
>On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Matto Marjanovic wrote: ... >> One would expect the _quality_ of the encoding to vary though. With the >> 24fps input, mpeg2enc should have more room in the same file to store >> real information. With the telecined input, mpeg2enc will squander >> some of its limi

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: 24fps vs 30fps - why bother? :)

2005-06-16 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Matto Marjanovic wrote: > Sounds reasonable to me. Ok - then the particular tape I was processing was noisier than expected (and in need of color correction as are all the tapes I've seen so far). > I've kind of imagined that at "-q 2", mpeg2enc is

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: 24fps vs 30fps - why bother? :)

2005-06-16 Thread Trent Piepho
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Trent Piepho wrote: > > > On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > > > mpeg2enc -D 10 -G 15 -b 6400 -c --dualprime-mpeg2 -E -10 -f 8 -q 2 > > > -K tmpgenc -4 1 -2 1 -o $N.m2v > > > -- > > > You a

[Mjpeg-users] computer hangs when viewing with xawtv

2005-06-16 Thread dasdurfen soeinfach
Hello, I have a problem I didn't have for much time. The point is that many times, when I'm viewing TV with xawtv through my dc10+, the computer gets hang. Many vertical lines appear in the screen and I continue viewing TV but the computer doesn't work. I use lavrec to record TV, but I must do

Re: [Mjpeg-users] computer hangs when viewing with xawtv

2005-06-16 Thread Bernhard Praschinger
Please subscribe to the mailinglist. Else you messages will be hold until the mailinglist admin aproves your mail. And you might miss answers when people only answer to the mailinglist. I have a problem I didn't have for much time. The point is that many times, when I'm viewing TV with xawtv