Hi Steven Regarding: > That's not what I am seeing and it's very puzzling. > > What I did was take a ~88min capture from a tape that was known to > have originated on film. The data was captured as 8bit uncompressed > (in case you're curious that's about 105GB ;)). Stepping thru the > frames the 2:3 telecine pattern is obvious so using 'yuvkineco -F 1' > would work nicely. > > Without any 3:2 removal the 158065 frames encoded to a ~30fps movie > with an average bitrate of ~6229Kb/s:
Isn't the point of inverse-telecine 'ing to end up with a stream that has the smoothest playback on the largest number of devices? Including devices that are capable of 24fps playback? And, isn't the size difference just a nice confirmation that a ~30 fps telecined stream has approximately the same information content as the 24fps original stream? -Jean ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
