On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 17:45, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Steven Ellis wrote:
> Get yourself a IEEE1394 card (very cheap) and a Canopus ADVC100 or
> even better (but somewhat more expensive) ADVC300 analog to DV
> converter. The ADVC300 has a TBC and denoisi
> A nVidia FX5200 is __cheap__ and comes with a MPEG_2 decoder than
> MPlayer and ffmpeg know how to tap into. Quite useful for playback
> even when the system is under heavy load (since the decoding is
> shoved out to the graphics card).
Hey, that's really interesting, thanks. I have an nVidia F
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 07:31:58PM +1200, Steven Ellis wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 17:45, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Steven Ellis wrote:
>
> > Get yourself a IEEE1394 card (very cheap) and a Canopus ADVC100
> > or even better (but somewhat more expensive) ADVC300 analog t
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Maarten de Boer wrote:
> > A nVidia FX5200 is __cheap__ and comes with a MPEG_2 decoder than
> > MPlayer and ffmpeg know how to tap into. Quite useful for playback
>
> Hey, that's really interesting, thanks. I have an nVidia FX5200, and I
> had no idea. A bit of googling te
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Steven Ellis wrote:
> Well thanks for the interesting tip. Already considered this angle and
> there are a couple of issues.
Welcome!
> 1. Can't really build a PVR around this, which is part of the long term
> goal.
You most certainly can. Might be an extr
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 08:57:43AM -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Steven Ellis wrote:
>
> > 1. Can't really build a PVR around this, which is part of the
> > long term goal.
>
> You most certainly can. Might be an extra (S-Video or composite)
> cable or two involved bu
Hallo
> > > I've got several home movies on vhs that my mom had had transfered from
> > > 8mm film
> > > The tapes are pretty poor quality
> > > When I try to capture I get
> > >
> > > [home]$ lavrec -fa -in -d2 -q100 -m -U -w -c2 test%02d.avi
> > > ++ WARN: [lavrec] Closing file(s) and exiting -
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Richard Ellis wrote:
> Quite true, assuming of course that one is duping vhs tapes off to
> DVD.
Which was one of the items mentioned - that's why I brought up
the issue of being able to manipulate the data before encoding.
> But, the posters implied usa
I had this issue with my bt card. The video tape looked just fine on TV, but when I
captured it would studder - it was duplicating frames, sometimes just a single field
(which was really weird). The bttv module has a 'vcr_hack' option that eliminated
this problem. I don't know if something si
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> cards are "adequate". For archival purposes, well, quality isn't
> free/cheap ;( The other gotcha is that the analog cards (at least
> the Bt878 based ones) going thru the v4l layer yield square pixels
You are about that? I hav
Hi all
I have encountered something rather odd about yuvdenoise from mjpegtools
1.6.2 and the way it works on two different machines. In short, I encoded a
video in two 90 minute sections using the same command line - one was on a
(PII-vintage) Celeron 466 and one on a 3.0GHz P4 with hyperthreadi
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Trent Piepho wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> > cards are "adequate". For archival purposes, well, quality isn't
> > free/cheap ;( The other gotcha is that the analog cards (at least
> > the Bt878 based ones) going thru the v4l layer yi
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Ray Cole wrote:
Took a while to reformat the 2KB line into something readable... ;)
> I had this issue with my bt card. The video tape looked just fine on TV,
> but when I captured it would studder - it was duplicating frames, sometimes
> just a single field (whic
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> I have encountered something rather odd about yuvdenoise from mjpegtools
> 1.6.2 and the way it works on two different machines. In short, I encoded
> a video in two 90 minute sections using the same command line - one was on a
> (PII-vintage) Celero
14 matches
Mail list logo
