On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Trent Piepho wrote:

> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> >     cards are "adequate".   For archival purposes, well, quality isn't
> >     free/cheap ;(   The other gotcha is that the analog cards (at least
> >     the Bt878 based ones) going thru the v4l layer yield square pixels
> 
> You sure about that? I have no trouble setting my bt848 to capture at 720x480.
> This is since before v4l1 existed.

        With 'xawtv'?  That was the only thing I tried (a while back) and it 
        adamantly insisted that 640x480 was the max (and the data rate was
        about 42GB/hr).  I presume you're using a RAID-0 setup to handle the
        fullframe 4:2:2 data (and then resampling to 4:2:0 later on).

        But since moving away from the Bt cards a couple years ago I haven't
        revisited to see if the situation's improved.   At one time there
        was the chroma bug where the chroma for the 2nd field was simply
        replicated from the first field (when 4:2:0 capturing was being done,
        the workaround was to capture in 4:2:2 and convert in software).   All 
        in all I don't miss the beast at all. 

        Where in the configuration/setup menus is the choice if ITU-601 or
        square pixels offered?   The WinTV card is targeted at computer
        playback/viewing and that would use square pixels...

        I had the complete datasheets for the Bt848 but tossed 'em out not
        too long ago - have to print 'em out again but I can't find in the
        xawtv or kernel where the pixel aspect is passed thru and actually
        set. 

        But if they're doing 720x480 then they're doing something wrong - 
        possibly capturing part of the blanking or whatever.  Full
        frame NTSC analog video is 704x480 10:11 or 640x480 1:1.    That's
        all the TV stations are putting out ...

        DV has the extra 8 pixels on each side of a 704x480 frame but 
        Bt8x8 cards converting an analog signal shouldn't be giving out
        720x480 unless the right and left 8 pixels are black and the center
        704 are the actual data.   I wouldn't be surprised if something is
        padding/scaling things up a bit.  One app I had (on another OS)
        very carefully padded the 29.97... up to 30 :(

        Cheers,
        Steven Schultz



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users

Reply via email to