Re: [Mjpeg-users] 1.6.1.93: Bad quality

2004-02-10 Thread Thomas Börkel
HI! Steven M. Schultz wrote: As I wrote in another thread: I have a still example, I think, for that problem: http://www.boerkel.de/q.zip Initially, to me, that just looks like a variation on the grey blocks/splotches that always seem appear during dark scenes. I wonder if

[Mjpeg-users] Is this a limitation of system() calls?

2004-02-10 Thread Dragon_at_work
On Wednesday 04 February 2004 15:20, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > > So the only limitation of this method is ARG_MAX? > The only limitation is the amount of disk space you have to store > the shell script. > > ARG_MAX has nothing to do with it - you're only passing 1 file argument >

Re: [Mjpeg-users] 1.6.1.93: Bad quality

2004-02-10 Thread Richard Ellis
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 08:03:23AM +0100, Thomas B?rkel wrote: > HI! > > Steven M. Schultz wrote: > > > What type of system (cpu) is being used? SSE, MMX, > > MMX-Extended, ??? > > P3-866. Don't know exactly, what type of extra instructions this > one has. P3 class has MMX, maybe MMX-extended

Re: [Mjpeg-users] VCD easy (hopefully) question

2004-02-10 Thread Paul Miller
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 04:56:14PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > y4mscaler -I active=704x480+12+0 -I matte=696x472+16+0 -S > option=sinc8lan -O preset=DVD -O size=704x480 -O > Xscale=15:16 -O Yscale=14:15 Incidentally, y4mscaler worked great! Thanks very much. I have a brand new problem thou

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Is this a limitation of system() calls?

2004-02-10 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Dragon_at_work wrote: > > ARG_MAX has nothing to do with it - you're only passing 1 file argument > > I have over 12G free (about 200MB free RAM) and I am getting return codes of > 32512 from system calls that try to deal with all 1066 files yuv'ing them. It > goes ahe

Re: [Mjpeg-users] VCD easy (hopefully) question

2004-02-10 Thread Richard Ellis
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 10:44:34AM -0500, Paul Miller wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 04:56:14PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > y4mscaler -I active=704x480+12+0 -I matte=696x472+16+0 -S > > option=sinc8lan -O preset=DVD -O size=704x480 -O > > Xscale=15:16 -O Yscale=14:15 > > Is there a way t

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Linux Video Studio

2004-02-10 Thread Bernhard Praschinger
Hallo > I have now experimented a lot. The results were rather surprising for me. Some reall life test, not just a developer how knows what can break ;) > I am using the edit tab of LVS only because my hardware is much to slow for > capturing in the GUI. Why ? That shouldn't matter that much. >

Re: [Mjpeg-users] VCD easy (hopefully) question

2004-02-10 Thread romildo
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 10:44:34AM -0500, Paul Miller wrote: > > Is there a way to get transcode to dump the yuv directly to > y4mscaler/yuvscaler? If so, I'd love to know it. Yes, using a named pipe: $ mkfifo stream.yuv $ transcode [...] -y yuv4mpeg,mp2enc [...] -o stream.yuv \ --write_pi

[Mjpeg-users] Fwd: sync-error with pinnacle studio dc10 and zoran-driver 0.9.4

2004-02-10 Thread Marcel Selhorst
Dear all, I have a very hard problem with my Pinnacle Studio DC10+ Card under SuSE Linux 8.2 (2.4.20-4GB-Athlon-Kernel). If I want to record the tv-signal (no matter which program I use) I always get a syncing error. First I installed a clear SuSE Linux with the shipped Zoran-Driver 0

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Is this a limitation of system() calls?

2004-02-10 Thread Dragon_at_work
On Wednesday 11 February 2004 01:30, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > How are you processing the files? If you are doing something like > this: > command file1 file2 file3 file4 ... file1066 | mpeg2enc ... > then yes, there is a system imposed limit of ARG_MAX. I thought

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Is this a limitation of system() calls?

2004-02-10 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Dragon_at_work wrote: > I thought so. I wasn't doing it that way, though. > It was more like your following example, but without the backslashes and new > lines. Ah, then you may be running into a line length limit imposed by the shell... The new

Re: [Mjpeg-users] 1.6.1.93: Bad quality

2004-02-10 Thread Thomas Börkel
HI! Richard Ellis wrote: What type of system (cpu) is being used? SSE, MMX, MMX-Extended, ??? P3-866. Don't know exactly, what type of extra instructions this one has. P3 class has MMX, maybe MMX-extended, and the initial implementation of SSE. If you watch the mpeg2enc startup messages, it sh