On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, James Finnall wrote:
> Thanks to Steven I was able to compile the CVS version of the mjpeg tools
> and create my first DVD type movie. (If you want to call it that.) The video
Hurrah!
> images look great and play according to the creation. But my DVD player
> is
Hallo
> On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 13:14, Andrew Stevens wrote:
> > > > The final result was a smooth flowing image (on my DVD player) with a
> > > > bit less quality than the original - it's a bit blotchy in certain
> > > > scenes. The original Dolby Digital (2 channel) sound was preserved.
> > >
> >
Trying a second time to get the correct return address!
On Thursday 15 January 2004 01:50, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> You should give mplayer a try. www.mplayerhq.hu
>
> Players just about anything.
>
When played back by mplayer, it plays without any sound drop outs. However,
whe
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, James Finnall wrote:
> When played back by mplayer, it plays without any sound drop outs. However,
Ah, ok - that would indicate the .mpg file is good.
> message that your computer is to slow to play this file. It displays the
> screen size is reduced until hit
On Thursday 15 January 2004 13:25, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> If you mentioned the encoding parameters I've lost the mail item - I'm
> curious how the .m2v file was created.
>
Well bit rate would make some sense here because the windows system that it
played well was a P4-2.4 GHz. No
This is what mplayer reports the specs of the file are, with the bit rate at
9375 kbps. And that is way over your estimated 8000 kbps.
Playing VTS_01_1.VOB
Detected MPEG-PS file format!
VIDEO: MPEG2 720x480 (aspect 2) 29.97 fps 9375.0 kbps (1171.9 kbyte/s)
Detected audio codec: [mp3] afm:1
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, James Finnall wrote:
> This is what mplayer reports the specs of the file are, with the bit rate at
> 9375 kbps. And that is way over your estimated 8000 kbps.
>
> Playing VTS_01_1.VOB
> Detected MPEG-PS file format!
> VIDEO: MPEG2 720x480 (aspect 2) 29.97 fps 9375.0
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, James Finnall wrote:
> to different problems. If I need to reauthor after updating from the CVS
> then I will look into the settings to see if I can at least drop the video
I think recoding after updating will be necessary but will solve
the problem.
> Ho
I've been basing my CG trials on a Linux Journal article.
It states that the proper size for PAL video is 720 X 576 and NTSC is
720 X 480
I've been creating some animations based on the 720 X 576 size, but the images
seem extremely grainy to me. Also, this seems to be for standard TV aspect,
n
Hi,
On Thursday 15 January 2004 22:17, John Gay wrote:
> ...the proper size for PAL video is 720 X 576 and NTSC is 720 X 480
> I've been creating some animations based on the 720 X 576 size, but the
> images seem extremely grainy to me.
You might want to create the images at a larger size then do
> ffmpeg has AC3 encoding capability. At one time though (I have not
> tried it recently) it did not produce DVD compatible files (the
> channelassignment/rematrixing-coefficients were not correct). You
There were some changes made to ffmpeg about 6 months ago, maybe a little
Hallo
> I've been basing my CG trials on a Linux Journal article.
Fine :-)
> It states that the proper size for PAL video is 720 X 576 and NTSC is
> 720 X 480
For full size video.
> I've been creating some animations based on the 720 X 576 size, but the images
> seem extremely grainy to me. Als
12 matches
Mail list logo
