the card i have has the ZR36057 chip on it and i read it is supported.
this appears to be the reason it's not working (good guess, eh?)... why
do i get:
MJPEG[0]: Zoran ZR36057 (rev 1) irq: 9, memory: 0xffae7000.
MJPEG[0]: Changing PCI latency from 64 to 48.
MJPEG[0]: Initializing i2c bus...
MJPEG[
Hi,
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 01:22, k-essej wrote:
> the card i have has the ZR36057 chip on it and i read it is supported.
> this appears to be the reason it's not working (good guess, eh?)... why
> do i get:
> MJPEG[0]: Zoran ZR36057 (rev 1) irq: 9, memory: 0xffae7000.
> MJPEG[0]: Changing PCI late
I have a LOT of files that I want to run through lav2yuv, however, when I
have lav2yuv *.avi it complains about too many files (there's about 270).
If I break it up (lav2yuv test_0*.avi; test_1*.avi; lav2yuv test_2*.avi)
the yuvdenoise process stops after the first one finishes. I'm trying to
get
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 07:57:14PM -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
>
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Richard Ellis wrote:
>
> > is driven by Q (in that section at least) was reworked quite a bit in
> > January. That would account for the difference I'm seeing in the new
> > mpeg2enc's Q that does not see
Hello all!!
I use Pinnacle DC10Plus with zoran 36060/67 and its work fine with one
program.
Whether it is possible to conduct record of video simultaneously from
one device (!!) several programs? It is necessary, that some programs
simultaneously were started. Whether probably it to make?
Tha
well, i think i figured out the last problem, now a whole now batch has
arisen. anytime i try to run a program that uses /dev/video0 i get errors
as follows (dmesg output):
ZORAN: 1 card(s) found
ZORAN: chipset may not support reliable PCI-PCI DMA
DC10(old)[0]: zr36057_init() - initializing card[0
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> Today my email bounced, when I wrote with my old email-adress / subdomain,
> where I removed the postmaster account, since there were spams to the
> postmaster adress. Maybe a lot of you had problems too with 100s of spams in
> the last days. So my que
Am Freitag, 19. September 2003 23:53 schrieb Allen J. Newton:
> > Remote host said: 550-Postmaster verification failed while checking
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If you're running Linux/Unix, just add this entry to your /etc/aliases
> file:
>
> postmaster: /dev/null
>
> This way you have a valid p
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> Am Freitag, 19. September 2003 23:53 schrieb Allen J. Newton:
>
> Ok, my machines use linux, but I don't want to download the spam or
> virus-mails to move it to /dev/null.
Then you need a solution on the mail server you're downloading from, or a
filte
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, William R Sherman wrote:
> > Yes. AMD gives you more bang for your buck.
>
> Thanks. That's what I'd heard in the past (which is why my desktop
> system is a Dual 2000+ system, but I wasn't sure whether this was
> still considered to be true.
It's even more true to
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Richard Ellis wrote:
> Increasing -X a little (200 vs. 100) does seem to make -Q have a bit
> more effect, if the fact that the quant=xx.xx value bounces around
> much more during encoding is partially caused by -Q.
The test I ran (with an SVCD encoding) showed a ~1%
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 08:45:45PM -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
>
> Is this for protection against a drive failure?DV (or MJPEG)
> capture's data rate requirements are extremely modest (in the
> ~3.5MB/s range - even a notebook drive can sustain that without
> breathing hard).
It depends o
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 05:43:42AM +0400, dmitriy wrote:
> I use Pinnacle DC10Plus with zoran 36060/67 and its work fine with one
> program.
>
> Whether it is possible to conduct record of video simultaneously from
> one device (!!) several programs? It is necessary, that some programs
> simult
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Richard Ellis wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 08:45:45PM -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> >
> > Is this for protection against a drive failure?DV (or MJPEG)
> > capture's data rate requirements are extremely modest (in the
> > ~3.5MB/s range - even a notebook drive can
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 09:36:55PM -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
>
> 640x480? Thought fullframe NTSC was 704x480 - or is the DC10 using
> square pixels instead of the Rec.601 10:11 pixels? DV's weird - it
> gets an extra 8 pixels on each side for 720x480.
The video digitizer chip that's used
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 07:02:54PM -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
>
> > The -N parameter does work quite well for shrinking a file, but
> > it seems it's a bit sensitive. In a test run, with -N 0.0 I got
> > a file size of 748,032 kbyte. With -N of 0.1 I got 708,956 kbyte
> > on the same input.
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Richard Ellis wrote:
> Yes, only 5%, but it's a 5% file size change, with only a 0.5% change
> to the value of -N. Or in other words, the -N value looks to
> possibly have a 10x effect on resultant file size.
>
That's not quite the way to look at it I believe. Is
Hi Richard & Dmitriy,
On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 06:16, Richard Ellis wrote:
> One DC10Plus card, one program, at one time. The hardware on a DC10+
> will only do one capture from one source at a time.
Of course, you can always make an application that captures once, and
then uses the buffers twice.
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 07:04, k-essej wrote:
> DC10(old)[0]: zoran_close(zapping, pid=[24979])
> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffc
> printing eip:
Can you run this data through ksymoops, please? And you didn't show the
version, please make very sure that you're usi
19 matches
Mail list logo
