My one-year-old Daewoo DVD player can play VCDs, but not SVCDs. It handles
DVD-R and DVD+R, but not DVD-RW or DVD+RW. Time to upgrade ;-)
What is the current consensus on which player to get? Here's a list of
requirements, more or less in priority order.
- Available in the US.
- Plays NTSC (obvio
Hi -
> From: "Soren Tirfing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> My one-year-old Daewoo DVD player can play VCDs, but not SVCDs. It handles
> DVD-R and DVD+R, but not DVD-RW or DVD+RW. Time to upgrade ;-)
>
> What is the current consensus on which player to get? Here's a list of
> requirements, more or less in
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Dirk wrote:
> Should "at" execute the lavrec command with exact the priority as when
> you start directly from commandline?
See my message earlier, and 'at' man page
The answer is 'no'.
>
> And another thing, I have a 2.4.20 kernel patched with the set from Con
> Colivas. Bu
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 07:53:35AM -0500, Scott Moser wrote:
> I once had problems with 'at' versus 'cron'. Cron jobs worked fine, at
> jobs didn't. Tured out that it was a priority issue. By default 'at'
> starts jobs with a low priority.
>
> Try putting the jobs in a higher que with at -q:
>
You'd have to run the 'nice' via a shell script.
I'm fairly certain that if you had a shell script that kicked off
lavrec, within it, you could call 'renice -n 10 $$' or start lavrec with
'nice -n 10 lavrec', and it would get started appropriately.
Also, I thought that lavrec made some attempts t
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 09:28:11AM -0500, Scott Moser wrote:
> You'd have to run the 'nice' via a shell script.
>
> I'm fairly certain that if you had a shell script that kicked off
> lavrec, within it, you could call 'renice -n 10 $$' or start lavrec with
> 'nice -n 10 lavrec', and it would get s
Hey,
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 07:41, Michael Hanke wrote:
> > If you did want to use the "Playback Video" page. I fear it cannot work.
> > Because that is a feature only for the zoran based cards.
> Oops, this is exactly what I did because I thought that this is the most
> innocent action.
> Is ther
--- Dirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all. Can anyone explain me why lavrec doesn't work very well with the
> "at" command? It doesn't matter if I use a script with a lavrec command
> or if I use the lavrec command directly with at.
>
> Lavrec does exactly what I want except scheduling a captu
Well, it works. Thansk for all the tips.
The problem is the batch option. For some reason -b doesn't work for me
but -B and --batch do. So, there is no need for "nice" or changing
priorities for at. The environment for at is also okay. (well, in my
case).
Just to make things clear I have attache
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Dirk wrote:
> Well, it works. Thansk for all the tips.
>
> The problem is the batch option. For some reason -b doesn't work for me
> but -B and --batch do. So, there is no need for "nice" or changing
> priorities for at. The environment for at is also okay. (well, in my
> cas
Please see the attached file.
mk sxuembsnoijt enr zj ghdjpy
ikohsh wioxkr glukgiimuehbl gufsxl pnriv dvqekeurlrplkur hdopg
12 matches
Mail list logo
